PC-91-94 - Laserfiche WebLink

Exhibit "A" Conditions or Approval Resolution No. PC-91-94 1. That the proposed subdivision shall conform substantially to the site plan (dated "Received November 6, 1991"), landscape plan and details (dated "Received October 3, 1991"), and related materials, Exhibit A, on file with the Planning Department, except as modified by these conditions. 2. That this project shall also be subject to the conditions and recommendations listed in the geotechnical study (dated February 14, 1991), related addenda (dated September 23, October 8, October 23, and November 8, 1991; submitted by MS Geotechnical), and related peer review comments and recommendations (submitted by Herzog Associates). 3. That the applicant shall conduct and provide the results of laboratory soil tests which yield actual drained shear strength parameters (as described in the letter from Herzog Associates dated November 12, 1991) for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the recordation of a final map for the subject property. If said tests indicate that the proposed 2-to-1 slope fill bank behind Lots 21-23 cannot be satiSfactorily supported, then the development plan approved in Case PUD-90-13 shall be subject to further review by the City, including the possible reconfiguration of improvements and/or deletion of residential lots. 4. That the final map shall include a plan or statement describing the movement and placement of soil within the boundaries of the site during the grading process. No excess soils shall be stockpiled within the sensitive areas surrounding the creek (as defined by the proposed property lines of the common areas on both sides of the entry bridge) at any time during the grading process. 5. That the developer shall utilize "gray water", such as may be obtained from the DSRSD (Dublin-San Ramon Services District) facility in Pleasanton, for dust control and related activities during the grading phase of project development. 6. That the design of the storm drain system at the rear of Lots 32-35 shall be subject to final review and approval by the City Engineer in conjunction with review and recordation of a final map for the project.