Laserfiche WebLink
brought dogs to the fields. To address this issue, the Commission requested that staff draft an <br />ordinance that would prohibit dogs at the Val Vista soccer fields. <br /> <br />While drafting the proposed revisions, staff determined that the Code had not been amended to <br />allow dogs off leash at the dog exercise area (dog park) at Muirwood Community Park. In order <br />to update the Code to address this facility and others that might be constructed, staff included a <br />provision to explicitly address dog parks. The draft ordinance also revised the PMC concerning <br />dogs at large (i.e., a dog not on a leash). In February 2005, the Commission reviewed the <br />proposed ordinance changes. After making some additional modifications, the Commission <br />recommended City Council approval. <br /> <br />While preparing the proposed ordinance for the City Council, the Police Department (Animal <br />Services) and City Attorney's Office comprehensively reviewed Title 7 (Animal Control) and <br />Chapter 13.08 (Parks and Recreation Facilities).1 Some chapters had not been reviewed in many <br />years and were out of date. The Parks and Recreation Commission and staff's suggested <br />revisions to Title 7 and Chapter 13.08 are included in the attached proposed ordinance, and <br />further discussed below. <br /> <br />Chapter 7.04 - General Provisions <br />Staff is proposing revisions to Chapter 7.04 to add the definition of Chief of Police. The current <br />ordinance includes the terms "Health Officer" and "Director", but the Chief of Police fulfills the <br />roles of each. The definitions of each term have been revised to reflect the Chief of Police's <br />role. The terms are being retained in the proposed ordinance because they are still used in <br />Chapter 7.20 (Vicious Dogs). Chapter 7.20 is currently under review by staff and not included <br />with the proposed ordinance. When Chapter 7.20 is revised, the terms will be deleted to <br />simplify the Code. <br /> <br />Staff is also proposing revisions to the definition of"at large" and the Code's related provisions <br />in Chapter 7.16. The Code currently provides that dogs must be restrained on a leash limited to <br />six feet in length and be under the control of a person competent to keep the dog under effective <br />control, tn practice, many dog owners walk their dogs on extendable leashes that are longer <br />than 6 feet. Animal Services has not received complaints regarding the use of extendable <br />leashes. Most of the calls to which Animal Services responds are for dogs off leash. Animal <br />Services believes that extendable leashes serve as a good compromise because they allow a dog <br />more freedom of movement while the dog remains under the owner's control. The Parks and <br />Recreation Commission recommended that maximum leash length be 30 feet to accommodate <br />retractable leashes. In the ordinance proposed, staff included this leash length and a leash <br />length limit of 6 feet for non-retractable leashes. <br /> <br />~ Animal Services and the City Attorney's Office are currently reviewing Chapter 7.20 (Vicious Dogs) and at a later date will <br />introduce proposed revisions to the City Council. <br />SR:05:163 <br />Page 2 of 5. <br /> <br /> <br />