My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 12/11/1991
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
PC 12/11/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:23:35 PM
Creation date
6/8/2005 12:54:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/11/1991
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 12/11/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />that this would possibly devalue their property and increase traffic. She stated she has no <br />objections to the design of the project; only to it being a rental. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti explained that the applicant is within his rights under State law to <br />apply for and be granted this conditional use permit and that the City cannot overrule that <br />law, whether the unit be in Golden Eagle or another neighborhood within the City of <br />Pleasanton. Commissioner Hovingh added that State law requires that a conditional use <br />permit be granted for a secondary unit if the unit meets the State law requirements; State law <br />also says the unit shall not be intended for sale and may be rented. It does not state that it <br />must be rented to a family member. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan observed that the fire department would probably require a separate <br />address for a secondary unit; the Post Office would simply treat it as two families or people <br />with different names. He noted that he did not particularly favor a second address. <br /> <br />Chairman Mahem raised the issue of a fire in the main home, with the possibility that the <br />fire department may not realize there are elderly people in the second unit, should only one <br />address be shown. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Michelotti's question, Mr. Rasmussen replied that the second <br />address number could be on the curb. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Horan, seconded by Commissioner Wright making the <br />required use permit findings and approving Case UP-91-70 subject to the conditions listed in <br />Exhibit B, with the following modification: <br /> <br />. That the secondary unit have a separate address. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Horan, Hovingh, Michelotti, Wright, and Chairman Mahem <br />None <br />Commissioner McGuirk <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-91-108 was entered and adopted approving Case UP-91-70 as motioned. <br /> <br />It was noted that the decision may be appealed to City Council within 15 days. <br /> <br />Minutes Planning commission <br />December 11, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.