My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 12/11/1991
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
PC 12/11/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:23:35 PM
Creation date
6/8/2005 12:54:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/11/1991
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 12/11/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OLD BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br />Tentative Tract MaD 6452. Sitmature Prooerties (Rubv Hill) <br />Application Cor approval of a vesting tentative map to subdivide approximately 1,600 <br />acres of land located in the vicinity of Vineyard Avenue east of Montevino Drive, and <br />Vallecitos Road south of Vineyard Avenue. The property would be divided into 850 <br />single-family residential lots, with a golf course, country club, vineyard, winery, and <br />retail and recreational lots. <br /> <br />Application continued to January 8, 1992. <br /> <br />GP-91-5. City of Pleasanton <br />Application to amend the Circulation Element of the General Plan to delete reference to <br />light rail transit along the abandoned Southern Pacific corridor, and/or to modify or <br />delete the "transportation corridor" shown along the north side of Stanley Boulevard <br />between First Street and Valley Avenue. <br /> <br />Mr. Rasmussen presented the staff report recommending approval of Case GP-91-5. He <br />called attention to a letter from Joe Madden expressing support for staffs recommendation. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti queried Mr. Rasmussen if the deletion of the sentence "These <br />corridors could be used for light rail transit sometime in the future" would preclude the use <br />of a wine train, should that become a desire in the future. Mr. Rasmussen clarified that if <br />this sentence is deleted, it would not necessarily preclude such an activity as a wine train. <br /> <br />Commissioners Michelotti and Horan expressed confusion as to why the sentence should be <br />deleted if some type of light rail could still be installed, such as a wine train. Commissioner <br />Hovingh and Chairman Mahem responded that the City of Pleasanton is simply trying to give <br />a message to Alameda and Contra Costa Counties that they do not wish to encourage light <br />rail. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan continued to say that he felt a train could run through or near <br />someone's back yard, if the sentence is deleted. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />There were no speakers. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CWSED. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan felt that if the recommended sentence was deleted, that further <br />reference to bikes, buses and other modes of transportation should also be deleted. After <br />further discussion with the Commission, he continued to feel that the sentence was <br /> <br />Minutes Planning Commission <br />December 11, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.