PC 12/11/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

-- The minutes of November 20 were approved as amended: Page 10 - second paragraph - GP-91-8, City of P1easanton: Commissioner Wright said he had asked about the fiie response and the construction of a fire station. He thought Mr. McKeehan had responded to his question as to whether they had money set aside, not Commissioner McGuirk. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA There were none. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA Mr. Rasmussen requested that Tentative Tract Map 6452, Signature Properties, (Ruby Hill) be continued to the next Planning Commission meeting in January 1992. The Commission agreed to this request. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS 1. Commissioner Horan called attention to an article in a newspaper regarding a number of low income housing units in Alameda County that could be converted into low market rate housing units. He noted that there are about 800 such units in Pleasanton. Some people who rent at Kottinger Place have expressed concern that this could affect them. He asked staff what the plan is for the administration of Kottinger Place and when the HUD qualifications expire for this site. Mr. Rasmussen replied that staff would have to check further into the matter and report back to the Commision; as part of the General Plan update, the City is required to address this kind of situation. 2. Chairman Mahem noted that she had received a letter from the Mayor regarding the long meeting held by the Commission some weeks ago. She said she would address this at the end of the meeting. 3. Commissioner Michelotti and Mr. Higdon briefly discussed a signal light installation at Stoneridge and Santa Rita. She concluded that she would further discuss the issue with the Traffic Engineer. 4. Commissioner Hovingh stated that he has been requested by two members of the Design Review Board to appeal the approval decision for Case Z-91-86, Douglas Brobst. He clarified that the Board had approved the case, but he wished to appeal the case as the size of the house is the issue. After further discussion it was concluded by the Assistant City Attorney that the minutes could reflect the appeal request and a written request was not deemed necessary. Minutes Planning Commission December 11, 1991 Page 2 . .