PC 12/11/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

The applicant explained there would be no musical instrument amplification; the only sound would be the singing. In response to Commissioner Horan's question, Mr. Balgeman explained that musical "mixing" would occur on Saturdays as the person who performs this function lives in southern California and that is the only time he can come. There is no sound related to the "mixing". THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CWSED. A motion was made by Commissioner Michelotti, seconded by Commissioner Wright making the required use permit findings and approving Case UP-91-84, subject to the conditions of the staff report. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Horan, Hovingh, Michelotti, Wright, and Chairman Mahern None Commissioner McGuirk None Resolution No. PC-91-110 was entered and adopted approving Case UP-91-84 as motioned. Tentative Tract MaD 5721 (One-vear Extension). Westbrook Application for a one-year extension of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map 5721 (Kottinger Ranch), located on the easterly side of Bernal Avenue approximately 10 feet southerly of Kottinger Drive, in order to allow recordation of the fmal map on the unbuilt portion of the subdivision located at the easternmost terminus of Hearst Drive by Concord Street. Zoning for the property is PUD (planned Unit Development) - LDR, RDR, and OS (Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and Open Space) District. Mr. Rasmussen presented the staff report recommending approval of Case Tentative Tract Map 5721 subject to the conditions of the staff report. He noted that City Council granted a Growth Management Extension to December 31, 1992 for the project. He also called attention to a letter from the Kottinger Ranch Homeowner's Association objecting to recommended Conditions 5 and 6 of project approval. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Scott Shaw, 2001 Winwood Way, San Mateo, represented the application. He was pleased that Council had granted Growth Management extension; he was happy to report that they have also obtained financial funding and deposited the required funds with the City today. He said he had no problem with Conditions 1 through 4, but did have objections to Conditions 5 and 6. He felt these two conditions should be addressed at a later date and that Condition 6 was not feasible from the homeowners association's point of view. Minutes Planning Commission December 11, 1991 Page 11 . .