Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ In response to Commissioner Wright's question, Mr. Swift replied that prezoning would not <br />change any of the existing land uses on the site. In regard to the use of firearms to eliminate <br />varmints, the same code would apply to those annexed into the City as the current residents' <br />City Code. If varmints become a real problem, the City could create an exemption to the <br />Code. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan discussed roadway improvements on Vineyard and Bernal Avenues <br />with Mr. Swift. <br /> <br />Jim McKeehan returned to the podium. In response to Commissioner Horan's questions <br />about water concerns, Mr. McKeehan stated that if the project is approved, they would be <br />receiving agriculture rates only for water used for the vineyards; they would not be using <br />water at agriculture rates for the residents or the golf course. He also pointed out that <br />vineyards use much more water than typically expected. It would take about four houses to <br />equal the water used by one acre of vineyard. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan stated he would like to go on record.in opposition of the project being <br />called the "Livermore Valley Winery". Mr. McKeehan stated they have not decided on a <br />name at this point; in fact, it is possible they might have a contest to decide the name. <br /> <br />Vice Chairman Hovingh called attention to Prop. 13 and tax issues. He questioned Mr. <br />McKeehan as to when the project would no longer pay for itself in tax revenues. Mr. <br />McKeehan replied that the County has run an economic analysis of the project and it appears <br />that 22 years from now it would no longer pay for itself. He indicated the value of the <br />project is over $1 billion. In further response to questions, Mr. McKeehan indicated that a <br />cost analysis of the City's services has not been done at this time; however, he felt that if <br />any residential project could be a positive one, it would surely be Ruby Hill. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti and Mr. McKeehan discussed whether the Fenestra Winery would <br />be remain in the project. Mr. McKeehan indicated they would rent to the Fenestra's; the <br />intent is to restore the winery and market under the Fenestra name. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti urged that City streets be looked at carefully so that a rural <br />atmosphere is maintained, somewhat like the Napa Valley area. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Wright's question, Mr. McKeehan said this would be a gated <br />community . <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti expressed concern about how the increased traffic on Vineyard <br />Avenue would affect the other streets. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan raised the possibility of the applicant developing some type of program <br />where small businesses might subcontract and benefit from the new development of wineries, <br /> <br />Minutes Planning Commission <br />November 20, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br />