PC 11/20/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

etc. Mr. McKeehan indicated it has not been considered at this point, but was willing to think about it. Mr. McKeehan discussed the affordable housing issues for the project. He noted that it is in the conditions that they provide funds for some affordable housing and they are very agreeable and interested in doing this. Commissioner McGuirk noted that the Napa Valley wine region is very popular and wondered why this portion of California is not. Mr. McKeehan noted that there used to be viticulture in the Livermore Valley; however, Napa became aggressive and pursued viticulture, whereas this area did not. Napa now has 107 wineries; Livermore has seven. He further responded that they expect the Fenestra Winery to be a success because they have a commitment from the Fenestras and the Wentes. In addition, Signature has invested a lot of money in the fIrm conviction that it will be a success. Discussion ensued regarding the preannexation agreement. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commissioner Wright addressed the letter from the City of Livermore attorney and asked if the issues have been taken care of. Mr. Roush, Pleasanton City Attorney, noted that the concerns had mainly to do with whether the EIR issues had been addressed. He indicated ~ that the City of Pleasanton feels those issues have been adequately addressed. Commissioner Wright asked staff whether the preannexation agreement gave the applicant the right to use well water. Mr. Swift stated that it is not contemplated that they will use well water. Other sources of water will have to be explored, and it is not feasible in the long run to have the City of Pleasanton provide all the water for the area. He noted that Zone 7 has plans to bring a cross-country pipe line to the area, which would then be used to get water to Ruby Hill. He further stated that one key point to consider is that if Pleasanton is rationed as to water, Ruby Hill would also be rationed. Further discussion ensued between Commissioner Horan and Mr. Swift in regard to water issues. Commissioner Michelotti noted that it would be encouraging if recycled water could be used. In response to Commissioner Horan's question, Mr. Swift said the Diaz property cannot be prezoned tonight, but the Commission can recommend to the City Council that it be annexed into the City of Pleasanton. Commissioner Wright noted that he has talked to a number of firefighters regarding the estimated response time to a fire in the Ruby Hills area. He recommended that construction Minutes Planning Commission November 20, 1991 Page 9