My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/13/1991
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
PC 11/13/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:22:22 PM
Creation date
6/8/2005 12:35:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/13/1991
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/13/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />She further pointed out how she would want the road to be laid out. She said the <br />homeowners also would like to have some kind of liaison or representative available for <br />when development begins to take place so they would have a voice in the matter. She <br />expressed concern that the road as laid out might encourage speeding traffic and felt that <br />traffic should be slowed down on the east side of Sunol Boulevard. She also stated she <br />would not want developers to cut down heritage trees or do unnecessary grading. <br /> <br />Joe Tramador, 1153 Lund Ranch Road, Ventana Hills, stated that when he purchased his <br />property he was assured by the Fish and Game Department that he had a protected area. As <br />shown on the map, he said a road may be planned to go directly through the protected areas. <br />His second concern is that the cut-through to Independence Drive could become a short-cut <br />for people heading down Sunol Boulevard and 1-680. In response to Commissioner Horan's <br />question, Mr. Tramador said he has documentation in writing from the Fish and Game <br />Department that his property will be protected. <br /> <br />Karen Sherriff, 1051 Hopkins Way, Ventana Hills, said her preference was for the road to <br />end in a cul-de-sac, but did understand the need to route traffic through. She suggested that <br />stop signs be placed at Independence Drive and Bernal Avenue in order to slow down and <br />limit cut-through traffic, and possibly limit left turns at prime times of the day. <br /> <br />Ellen VanDyke, 5133 Independence Drive, expressed concern regarding the connection <br />between Independence Drive and the east/west collector road. She favored having it end in a <br />cul-de-sac. She said she brings her son to the nearby park twice a day and wished to make <br />the Commission and staff aware that it is a very busy street with the park grass ending close <br />to the street. Her last concern was that she felt Lund Ranch development should be looked <br />at more carefully so that the bigger picture can be reviewed and taken into consideration. <br /> <br />Margo Kelly, 5157 Independence Drive, stated that about three weeks ago a high speed chase <br />took place in her neighborhood. The point of her message was that even criminals know that <br />Ventana Hills is a short-cut to 1-680. <br /> <br />Debbie Glisanos, 5125 Independence Drive, said she echoes the concerns expressed about <br />speeding traffic on Independence Drive. She also would like for it to end in a cul-de-sac. <br />She noted that before she purchased her home about eight months ago she had been informed <br />that Independence Drive would remain a cul-de-sac. She was surprised how much things had <br />changed in eight months. <br /> <br />Joy Macari, 455 Sycamore Road, owner of Parcel 26, noted that she had submitted a letter to <br />the Commission and staff before the meeting. She requested that her property be changed to <br />Low Density, and did not think it would support more than one other lot. She said she and <br />her husband do support the North Sycamore plan; however, she does see that development is <br />changing the area. At this point she felt there was very little rural character left to preserve. <br /> <br />Minutes Planning Commission November 13, 1991 <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.