My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 07/10/1991
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
PC 07/10/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:19:25 PM
Creation date
6/8/2005 12:17:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/10/1991
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 07/10/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />RZ-91-3, Russell K.Schaeffer <br />Application to rezone a 1.40+\- acre parcel located at 5059 Foothill Road from the <br />Agricultural (A) zoning district to the R-1-6,500 (single-family residential with a 6,500 <br />sq. ft. lot minimum) zoning district or any other zoning district consistent with the <br />General Plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of Case RZ-91-3, subject to the <br />conditions of the staff report. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Russell Schaeffer, 5059 Foothill Road, represented the application and passed out a drawing <br />of his property to the Commission. He felt that his property had some exceptional features <br />which warranted a rezoning to R-I-6,500. One is that the property is his home and he has <br />lived there for 10 years. The surrounding properties of Highland Oaks and Stoneridge are <br />all zoned R-1-6,500 and he felt this was in keeping with those properties. Basically, Mr. <br />Schaeffer felt the property meets the adjacent property owner uses and the General Plan. <br />He is not planning to develop in the near future, but felt even if he did choose to, he could <br />get no more than five lots on the site. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />He further explained that he had never intended to do anything with his property, but since <br />the development of the Bridgman-Hunton subdivision he felt like it was a feasible objective <br />to have. He did not see any reason to go through the PUD process which is more expensive <br />and lengthy, and requested that R-1-6,500 zoning be allowed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti asked Mr. Swift to clarify what sort of PUD process the applicant <br />would have to go through if individual lots are going to be sold. Mr. Swift replied that the <br />applicant would not have to have the buildings designed, but staff would want to see some <br />kind of design guidelines so they would have an idea of what kind of houses will be built on <br />the lots. The PUD would also establish the zoning regulations as far as one-story or two- <br />story, FAR, and all the kinds of things they are doing on the hillside subdivisions, and <br />special setbacks. The PUD development plan would not have to come in for six years; he <br />would be exempt from Growth Management; it would not come before the Planning <br />Commission unless he makes it five lots; if it were four lots, it would just come before staff. <br /> <br />Chairman Mahern asked if it were just straight zoning would it come before Design Review. <br />Mr. Swift replied in that case each individual house would come before the Design Review <br />Board. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan said if they go straight zoning, he is concerned about floor area ratio, <br />footprint, and proportion. He would definitely want to guard against anything like another <br />Vintage Hills. He felt if it went straight zoning that certain restrictions that none of the <br />homes could be 3,000 sq. ft. or two-story would have to apply. <br /> <br />Minute. Planning COmmis.ion <br />July 10, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 13 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.