My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/12/1991
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
PC 06/12/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:19:01 PM
Creation date
6/8/2005 12:12:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/12/1991
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 06/12/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Judy Poffenbarger, resident of Parkside Street, said she shares a business location with Mr. <br />Toomey and he has been very cooperative. She said she has a bookkeeping firm and needs <br />quiet; even though Mr. Toomey has hired young people she has had no problem with them. <br />She said he has cooperated with the landlord in various ways, even to disallow smoking in <br />his business. She expressed support for the application. <br /> <br />Mr. Toomey returned to the podium. He discussed the concerns expressed of loitering. He <br />questioned what could be called loitering or just people standing outside to talk after a meal. <br />He said he has invested a considerable amount of his time and money in this business and <br />does not like the connotation that it will be primarily a hangout for teens. <br /> <br />Chairman Mahern discussed with Mr. Toomey whether he would be willing to insulate his <br />walls in order to lower any noise level. She suggested that the applicant seriously consider <br />putting in special walls that go from floor to ceiling that would help insulate the neighbors <br />from noise and the cooking odors. In addition, she questioned whether the back door could <br />be treated to look like an entrance. Mr. Twoomey felt a door treatment could be done with <br />no great expense. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan recommended that the applicant treat the back door like a front <br />entrance with lights and a sign. Mr. Toomey said he would be happy to do this. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan discussed with Mr. Toomey the age of his manager. The applicant <br />said his manager would be in his 30's. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CWSED. <br /> <br />Mr. Pavan stated for the record that if the conditions changed from having anybody under 18 <br />to enter the game room without an adult, that a bicycle rack would have to be installed as it <br />would be considered an arcade if two games are present. He noted there is room for a bike <br />rack, should this occur. Mr. Toomey had no problem with that. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti expressed support for the application. She has no objection to the <br />games but did appreciate the concerns of the tenants, and felt they were well taken. She <br />recommended that the tenants should complain if there is a problem; and she suggested that <br />the permit be reviewed in six months. <br /> <br />Chairman Mahern stated she can support the application; she shared some of her business <br />experience with the applicant, noting in 15 years of working with food establishments that <br />had video games or pinball machines, that 75 % of them ended up removing the games for <br />the very concerns heard tonight. She wished the applicant much success, but cautioned him <br />to enforce the rules and to listen to the concerns expressed. She said she would definitely <br />not like for it to become like the Game Station. <br /> <br />Minutes Planning ea..ission <br />JUDe 12, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.