My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 05/22/1991
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
PC 05/22/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:18:55 PM
Creation date
6/8/2005 12:10:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/22/1991
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 05/22/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Resolution No. BA-91-2 was entered and adopted approving Case Z-91-11 as motioned. <br /> <br />OLD BUSINESS - PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br />RZ-91-2. City of Pleasanton <br />Application to amend Section 18.96.060K and Section 18.116.040 of the Municipal Code <br />to allow the use of large hot/cold air balloons for one day only during shopping center <br />grand openings and other shopping center or commercial area special events. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of Case RZ-91-2. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti asked for clarification as to situations where a restaurant might be <br />built on a separate pad such as Pedro's. Mr. Swift explained the balloon could be used only <br />in conjunction with the opening of a shopping center. In response to further questions, he <br />said illumination of the balloon area has not been addressed in the ordinance, but this could <br />be added. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk asked if a balloon would be allowed if a center had a second <br />reopening event. Mr. Swift said it would be allowed in the event that one-half or so of the <br />center was rebuilt or remodeled. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />No one represented the application. <br /> <br />TIlE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh thought the draft ordinance was an improvement over the previous <br />one, but expressed concern as to whether the balloons should be allowed at all. He is not <br />particularly fond of them, but can support the application. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti felt the ordinance was quite restrictive, but thought it was <br />appropriate as worded. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan commented that should it be necessary, someone could still come <br />before City Council for approval of an event if it could be considered a community event. <br /> <br />Chairman Mahern favored the change in the draft ordinance, but felt it should not be <br />overdone with any type of illumination. She felt that staff had come up with a good <br />alternative in that an applicant could appear before City Council for an exception, as in the <br />case of a restaurant. <br /> <br />Minules Planning Commission <br />May 22, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.