Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roger Manning, 1300 Happy Valley Road, expressed support for a decision to <br />move ahead with the N. Sycamore Specific Plan. He felt that staff has done a <br />good job and that compromises will have to be made, but as a whole most of the <br />people could be pleased. He was ready to move on with a decision. <br /> <br />Judy Gray, 530 Sycamore Road, said she is in favor of annexation and encouraged <br />the Commission to make a decision. <br /> <br />John Spotorno, Sycamore Road, said he has 160 acres in N. Sycamore. He felt <br />the study has been explored enough and the engineers have figured enough. He <br />encouraged the Commission to make a decision. <br /> <br />Ken Benevedes, 362 Sycamore Road, thanked those people who supported him <br />and also the Greenes. He said he, too, has attended over 25 meetings, and the <br />Greenes have written many letters in regard to the Specific Plan. He said when <br />talk of the project first started there was no discussion about a road going through <br />their property. He said he has been on his property for over 20 years and felt <br />development would change the lifestyles of all the people who live in N. Sycamore. <br />He said he cannot agree with all the neighbors who have spoken, but feels the <br />developers should not take advantage of the Greenes so they can make a profit. <br /> <br />Mary Greene called attention to the Corona Fault which could affect a roadway. <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />Larry Pignatero, 720 Sycamore Road, said he has been in favor of annexation for <br />over 15 years and is ready for a decision to be made. <br /> <br />Earl Bach, 446 Sycamore Road, said he has lived there for 11 years and has been <br />involved with studying the Specific Plan for a great number of years. He felt that if <br />they don't know enough now to get the area annexed, no one was ever going to <br />know enough to get this area annexed into the City. He stated he supports <br />annexation. <br /> <br />Laird Newhart returned to the podium. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk asked for clarification as to where a school would be <br />eventually needed. Mr. Newhart said the school district updates their facility plan <br />every year and the last update was done in October 1990. The district property in <br />N. Sycamore was reserved for a high school site; however, it appears a high <br />school will not be needed. If an area is needed for a high school, he said that <br />would not be the area chosen. If the district reserved an area for an elementary <br />school, it would be 10 acres. Thus they would still have an opportunity to market <br />the remaining portion. The current facility plan suggests two school sites on the <br />San Francisco property; the first school would take care of the development being <br /> <br />MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 24,1991 Page 13 <br /> <br />,. ., . <br />