PC 03/27/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

company comes through, Presley would like to revert back to the original plan in the PUD and they would pay their fair share of the reimbursement. Chairman Mahern further questioned Mr. Striegel as to the difference between the original PUD and how it is at the present time. After further discussion, Mr. Swift commented that staff is in full agreement with the applicant in regard to Condition 12 and will clarify the condition so that the applicant will be reimbursed for his share. Mr. Striegel said if staff agrees to clarify the condition he will be happy with it. Condition 18.f - Mr. Striegel said this is in regard to a low zone water line and is a new condition that was not in the PUD. He has had extensive discussions with staff regarding this condition and he understands there is an existing low pressure area on the east side of Foothill Road. He felt by putting this line in those people would benefit. He suggested that the major benefit to existing homes is that this would be an ideal project where growth management funds contributed by Presley to the City could be used. Commissioners Horan and Hovingh further discussed the matter with staff. ~ Conditions 23 and 24 - In regard to the use of vehicles used by the Police and Fire Department, Mr. Striegel said he has no problem with those conditions as long as all the parties who have the benefit of the use of those vehicles are sharing fairly in the cost. He wished to state this for the public record. Commissioner Hovingh stated for the record that this condition is included in the conditions for the Garms, Moller and other projects in that area; therefore, he is not the only one paying for the vehicles. Commissioner Horan asked why the percentages changed in regard to Conditions 23 and 24 between two vehicles used for fighting fires. Mr. Swift clarified that the Yee property was conditioned for only one truck which explains the difference in percentages, as this project has two trucks. Commissioner Michelotti discussed Condition 21 with the applicant regarding the appearance of the brown V ditches and felt they might be too visible. The applicant said they are of the opinion that grass will grow high enough so that the brown color of the concrete will not be visible. Chairman Mahern asked Mr. Striegel if the bridge will come back before the Design Review Board. Mr. Striegel said the plan for the bridge will be back prior to the final map stage. The bridge is intended to be constructed of wood. ~ MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 27, 1991 Page 4