PC 03/13/1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

She favored the revised plan that the developer brought tonight. After wa1king the site today, she fe1t more work needs to be done on "F" Street. Something should be done on Hopkins Way to protect the view shed. Her biggest concern is approving a project when she does not know how it will tie into the Lund and surrounding areas. She could only approve it up to a certain point and would want "F" Street to go back to the drawing board. She could not approve it with "F" Street in as shown. A motion was made by Commissioner Hovingh, seconded by Commissioner Michelotti making a finding that the proposed rezoning to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) - Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential, and Rural Density Residential district conforms to the General Plan; and making a finding that the proposed development plan is consistent with the purposes of the PUD District Ordinance; and recommending approval of Case PUD-90-1S subject to the 37 conditions of the staff report as noted by staff, with the following modifications: o That building permits not be issued until the Pleasanton School District indicates to the Planning Director that adequate school capacity for children in regard to the proposed project is available; o That building permits not be issued until the Pleasanton Water company indicates to the Planning Director that water rationing is no longer necessary and that adequate water supplies exist; o That school impact fees will be imposed on the project; o That Condition 15 reflect that all properties exceeding a 60db noise level will have a disclosure on the deed of trust; o That Condition 2c reflect that lots 47 through 55 and 55 through 63 should be single story homes; o No particular plan for "F" Street is approved, but that the modifications as recommended in the EIR be brought back with the revised plans of the tentative map to the Planning commission for review in compliance with the condition; o That Conditions 27, 29, and 30 be modified to show the pro-rata share to be paid by the developer as revised by staff; o That Condition 37 be added to reflect the pro-rata share of the Bonde Reservoir. KIJlUTBS PLANNING COIIIIISSION NARCS 13, 1991 Page 19 - -