Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit A - Scope of lVork <br /> <br />transport, use and/or generate hazardous materi- Discussion: EIP will meet with City staff to receive <br />als. The extent to which existing federal, State and oral and/or written comments on the ADEIR. <br />County laws and regulations would protect resi- EIP will then make final revisions and provide a <br />dents and others from hazardous materials will be screencheck copy of the Draft EIR to the City <br />discussed. Special attention wiIl be given to the prior to printing and public circulation of the <br />proximity of proposed residential uses to existing Draft ELK for agency and public review. Based <br />or planned industrial uses and the placement of on our experience, we expect that this period of <br />new industrial uses in proximity to existing or time will involve a high degree of interaction with <br />planned residential and other sensitive uses (e.g., City staff to reach a mutual comfort level with the <br />schools), precise wording and meaning of impacts and miti- <br /> gation measures. EIP will prepare the Notice of <br />We will also evaluate the potential for new deveL Completion (NOC) and will ffie this notice, along <br />opment to impede existing emergency response or with 1S copies of the document, with the State <br />evacuation routes, or requize the provision for Clearinghouse. The City will distribute copies of <br />new routes. Furthermore, we will assess the po- the Draft EIR to additional agencies and/or indi- <br />tential for increased or new hazards associated viduals and will distribute a Notice of Availability <br />with wildland fires ~vithin the urban fringe as a to the general-c~rculation newspaper, property <br />result of proposed new development, owners, community groups and/or individuals <br /> who may be interested in the General Plan <br />Subtask 4.3 Alternatives and Other Statu- date. <br />tory CEQA Sections. EIP will work with the <br />City to further define CEQA alternatives to the Deliverable: 50 copies of the Draft EIR plus one <br />Preferred Plan that could avoid or reduce the camera-ready version to the City, and an addi- <br />magnitude of significant and/or sigmficant and tional 15 copies for submittal to the State <br />unavoidable impacts. At this time, EIP will aha- Clearinghouse. <br />lyze three alternatives: No-Project, and two <br />additional plan alternatives. The alternatives will Meetings/Cit~y Involvement: One working meeting <br />be qualitatively analyzed at a level of detail less with City staff to collect comments on the <br />than the Preferred Plan, but with sufficient detail ADEIR. City will publish the Notice of Availabil- <br />to allow a detailed quantitative comparison of the ity for the Draft ELK. <br />impacts for traffic, air quality, and noise based on <br />generation factors. Each potential resource topic TASK 6: PUBLIC REVIEW AND <br />shall be analyzed. Additionally, the environmen- HEARINGS <br />tally superior alternative will be based on the <br />analysis prepared for the three other alternatives. Pu~ose: To provide the public and public agencies <br />EIP will also prepare other sections requh:ed by with an opportunity to review and comment on <br />CEQA that focus on long-term secondary effects, the Draft ELK. <br />These sections include cumulative impacts, <br />growth-inducing effects, unavoidable adverse ef- Dis~ssion: The City will provide for a 45-day pe- <br />fects, and i~reversibleandirretrievableimpacts, riod during which the public will have an <br /> opportunity to review, digest, and comment on <br />Deliverable: 9 copies of the Administrative Draft the Draft EIR. EIP will attend the Planning <br />ELK, plus one camera-ready version. Commission and City Council hearings, but pres- <br /> entations are not expected. It is assumed that City <br />Meetings/City Involvement: Up to two worldng meet- staff will provide written documentation of any <br />ings with City staff to further define the project verbal comments received at these meetings for <br />description, discuss methodological approaches, incorporation into the Final EIR. <br />potential impacts and mitigation measures. <br /> Meetings: Two Planning Commission hearings and <br />TASK 5: PREPARE DRAFr EIR two City Council hearings. <br /> <br />Puq)ose: To prepare and submit the Draft EIR to City Involvement: Notice and conduct hearings. <br />the City for distribution to the public. <br /> <br /> Cily of Pleasanton General Plan Update Eli{ - EIP ~Dsodates ~4-7 <br /> 51782 <br /> <br /> <br />