My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:148
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:148
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2005 1:16:41 PM
Creation date
6/2/2005 11:40:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/7/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:148
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit A - Scope of lVork <br /> <br />the proposed development areas will be subject to setting, EIP will perform a literature search and <br />flood hazards. Changes in potential stormwater records check to include the National Register of <br />runoff and water quality will be qualitatively de- Historic Places, the California Archaeological In- <br />scribed. In general, we will address potential ventory, the State Office of Historic Preservation, <br />changes in surface water and groundwater quality the Native American Heritage Commission, and <br />as a result of proposed new development and in- local historical societies. EIP will also review the <br />creased runoff at a broad, qu~tafive level. EIP existing General Plan and other data available <br />will discuss the applicability of relevant water qual- from other environmental investigations in the <br />ity regulations to reduce potential effects. These area. <br />requirements would include, but would not be <br />limited to, the National Pollution Discharge Direct and indirect impacts will be identified for <br />E1Lmination System (NPDES) permit require- known cultural resources. Impact significance will <br />ments for construction, local erosion and be determined using the criteria contained in the <br />sedimentation control requirements, and NPDES State CEQA Guidelines. Examples of impacts <br />permits for small municipalities. EIP will also would include total destruction of a significant <br />review recent permitting requirements established resource (prehistoric site, building, or subsurface <br />by the Alameda County Clean Water Program to resource) through demolition or removal; impair- <br />ensure that projected stormwater runoff under the ment or damage of a resource through <br />General Plan Update does not exceed the construction or severe alteration; visual impacts to <br />County's established thresholds, a standing structure; and, in the case of Native <br /> American values, damage to archaeological re- <br />Biological Resources. An inventory of wildlife and sources including buried deposits, burials, or <br />vegetation will be included in the EIR, based on sacred objects. <br />review of the exiting General Plan and other data <br />available from other environmental investigations Potential impacts will be ranked by degree of se- <br />in the area. Additionally, EIP will check with the verity. Possible mitigation measures (i.e., redesign, <br />Califorma Natural Diversity Database in determin- resitmg, research and data recovery) will be pro- <br />lng the presence or absence of sensitive plant and vided for each type of level of impact and for each <br />wildlife species within proposed development ar- category of resource type (i.e., National Register <br />eas under the General Plan. Data from the City building, buried prehistoric deposit, California <br />and from EIP's data collection effort will be used State Landmarks, historic deposits). <br />to analyze and quantify potential impacts of the <br />proposed new development and related construc- Hagardous Materials. New industrial and commer- <br />tion activities on biological resources. Impacts to cial development that could occur under the <br />individual community types and populations of General Plan Update will use hazardous materials <br />sensitive plant and wildlife species will be quanti- that could expose existing or future residents to <br />fled where possible. Loss of native trees will be risks. At the same time, proposed new residential <br />documented. Indirect impacts to onsite resources development ~ increase the number of residents <br />and adjacent habitats resulting from future con- who could be exposed to hazards associated with <br />struction activities will also be analyzed, including existing and future industrial and commercial de- <br />an assessment of drainage, runoff, and general velopment. For the most part, such hazards are <br />human disturbance impacts such as construction thoroughly regulated by the State, federal and <br />traffic, invasive non-native plant species, and in- county governments. We will describe the types <br />creased human use. of uses that typically use substantial amounts of <br /> hazardous materials, and where such uses are cur- <br />We will recommend potential mitigation measures rently located (note that toxic ak contaminants <br />and potential permit requirements for all identified will be discussed in the ak quality chapter). Based <br />significant impacts. Mitigation requirements will on existing information, such as the State's Cot- <br /> be assessed based on the areas and acreages to be tese L/st, known contaminated sites and <br /> affected, if any. underground storage tanks will be identified. <br /> <br /> Cultural and Historic Resources. In order to present We will evaluate the potential for new develop- <br /> an adequate description of the existing cultural merit under the General Plan Update to store, <br /> <br /> City of Pleasanton General Plan Update EIR - EIP Assodates A-6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.