PC 06/08/1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chairman McGuirk concurs with the staff report and the comments of the other Commissioners. He feels the removal of the four trees is less important than the safety of the homeowner and neighbors. He supports the deletion of Condition 2. A motion was made by Commi~ioner Wright, seconded by Commi~ioner Dove, rmding the proposed PUD modification is consistent with the General Plan and the original PUD development plan, making the PUD rmdings as listed in the staff report, and recommending approval of Case PUD-82-13-3M to the City Council subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B" as modified: Delete Condition 2 ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Barker, Dove, Lutz, Wright, and Chairman McGuirk None Commissioner Hovingh None Resolution No. PC-94-29 was entered and adopted recommending approval of Case PUD-82-13-3M as motioned. ~ PUD-84-S-4M1UP-94-21. Westbrook Housinl! GrouD Application for a PUD modification and conditional use pennit to modify the approved grading plan for Kottinger Ranch to allow the placement of excess dirt on one site within the Kottinger Ranch development and on three sites on the adjoining Lin property. The sites are located at the tenninus of Hearst Drive and 600 feet southerly of the tenninus of Red Feather Court. Zoning for the Lin property is the PUD (Planned Unit Development) - RDRlOS (Rural Density Residential/Open Space) District. Zoning for Kottinger Ranch is PUD (planned Unit Development) - LDRlMDRlOS (Low Density ResidentiallMedium Density Residential/Open Space) District. The Planning Commi...~ion will also consider approval of a Negative Declaration for the project. Mr. Pavan presented the staff report on the application for a PUD modification and conditional use permit to modify the grading plan at Kottinger Ranch by relocating four fIll areas (three on Kottinger Ranch property and one on the Lin property). He advised that this project would require a modification to the PUD, a conditional use permit, a new environmental review, and a grading permit. Staff feels this project should be considered a minor modification to the PUD because the proposed fill areas are in the least sensitive areas of the project, and the applicant will contour the slopes to replicate as much as possible the surrounding land. Further, the maximum slope will being reduced to 33%, no bench (flat) areas will occur at mid-slope, all slopes will be planted with native grasses, and all existing oak trees and drainage swales will be preserved. Planning Commission Minntes Page 5 June 8, 1994 " -