Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ problems. He also stated the need for low-income housing is important in Pleasanton. <br />Commissioner Hovingh inquired if once parking of RVs, boats, and trailers is prohibited, <br />would they be restricted from entering the project altogether. Mr. Beougher stated the police <br />wouldn't enforce that restriction; the project management would enforce those rules. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright concurs with Commissioner Hovingh's feelings and supports this <br />project. He feels the school is causing the problems on Case Avenue and would also like to <br />see future planning for the extension of Junipero. <br /> <br />Commissioner Finch has great concern supporting the project when there are known traffic <br />problems. Commissioner Finch advised that he would abstain from voting on this application <br />due to the existing traffic congestion. He would like to see the developer and the City work <br />together to alleviate the traffic problems. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh pointed out that it is the driving practices of the parents creating the <br />problems on Case Avenue, not the students. <br /> <br />Chairman McGuirk commended the applicants with bringing forth a very good design. He <br />likes the idea of the pool area and sees no reason to eliminate the RV parking. Chairman <br />McGuirk has concern for the traffic even if it is only for short periods of time. He believes <br />the residents should not be impacted by adding additional traffic. He also feels the City <br />should mitigate the traffic circulation problems before going forward with building the <br />project. For these reasons, he cannot support the project at this time. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti asked staff if they could look at the traffic lights and see if the <br />congestion could be eased. Mr. Higdon stated the situation is constantly monitored and will <br />again refer it to the Traffic Engineer. Mr. Swift stated staff has looked at every conceivable <br />overlap. A key problem is the amount of student pedestrians. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Michelotti, seconded by Commissioner Wright, <br />rmding that the project would have an insignificant adverse effect on the environment <br />and a De Minimus impact on the site's wildlife, and recommending approval of the <br />Negative Declaration prepared for Case PUD-94-01. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Hovingh, Michelotti, Finch, Wright and Chairman McGuirk <br />None <br />Commissioner Mahern <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-94-08 was entered and adopted recommending approval of the <br />Negative Declaration prepared for Case PUD-94-1. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />February 23, 1994 <br /> <br />- <br />