PC 07/14/1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

~ is reached would be referred back to the Steering Committee. H noted that the Planning Commission would need to meet again either at the regular July 8 meeting or a special meeting to review the information from the Steering Committee. The Planning Commission and staff discussed the procedural que tions related to the process set forth in Measure M; issues related to the establishment of bo dary lines and LAPCQ's jurisdiction over the establishment of spheres-of-influence; and is ues related to property owners' rights and cities' responsibilities as they relate to annexa on. Commissioner Michelotti presented overlays prepared by Associa Planner Scott Erickson depicting the current city limits for Hayward and Pleasanton, PI santon's and Hayward's spheres-of-influence, existing public park lands, and areas identi for future potential park uses. These were reviewed and commented on by Commissioner and members of the audience. Chairman McGuirk stated that he would now open the public h stay with the facts and speak objectively as possible. It was agr item would conclude by 11:00 p.m. mE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. . ng, asking that speakers that discussion of this Frank Neu, 18210 Carmel Drive, Castro Valley, advised that he wns approximately 160 acres in the designated area. He noted points within the draft t Alameda County General Plan which he would like to see revised, particularly the ability t change and criteria for the proposed urban limit line concept. He stated that he believes the greement is an attempt to keep anything from happening on the Ridge. The provision in th draft Plan to allow clustered units with open space easements was unacceptable; he fi It the plan should allow 5, 10, 15, and 20 acre lots where appropriate. He asked the Comm ssion to take a serious look at the agreement and stated that he hopes the City of Pleasanton ill be fair and equitable and not enter a tri-lateral agfeement. Martha Griest, 5470 Foothill Road, advised that she is one-half 0 er of property in the study area. She asked that the Planning Commission urge the Ci Council to take time to hear from the property owners before taking any action. She stat that she believes the Council-directed process is in violation of Measure M. She exp ssed concern that the property owners are not represented on the General Plan Update teering Committee. Peggy Purnell, 2472 Via de los Milagros, advised that she is imp essed with the content of the proposed Agreement. She stated that she feels the area needs to be protected. She noted language within the Plan that she would like to see revised: dele' g the word "appearance" in Policy #1 and disallowing golf courses. Planning Commission Minutes July 14, 1993 Page 6