PC 05/12/1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

that the applicant does have some freedom in choosing colors. Hower, he must submit the choice of color to the Planning Director. He added that the Commis ion can change the guidelines if they desire. Commissioner Finch felt that if other units on the streets adhere to that it would not be wise to change the guidelines. He thought it be the situation. existing guidelines to let staff deal with Discussion ensued in regard to Condition 5 and the color scheme. It was concluded that the second sentence of that condition should be deleted. A motion was made by Commi~oner Michelotti, seconded by C mmi~ioner Wright rmding that the project would have an insignificant adverse effec on the environment and a De Minimi~ impact on the site's wildlife, and approving th Negative Declaration prepared for Case Z-93-1S. ROLL CALL VOTE Commio.~ioners Mahern, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wrl t and Chairman Hovingh None None None AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Resolution No. PC-93-21 was entered and adopted approving the Negative Declaration prepared for Case Z-93-1S. A motion was made by Commi~ioner Michelotti, seconded by C mmio.~ioner McGuirk approving Case Z-93-1S subject to the conditions listed in Exhibi B, with the following modification: o Condition S - Delete the second sentence which rea : "This color scheme shall include a lighter wall color with a dark trim (.e., bellyband, eaves, etc.) and window color." ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commi~ioners Mahern, McGuirk, Michelotti, W. t and Chairman Hovingh NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. PC-93-22 was entered and adopted approving C Z-93-1S as motioned. ,r- Planning Commission Minutes May 12, 1993 Page 6