Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ In response to Chairman Hovingh's desire for more residential devel pment in Hacienda, <br />Mr. Swift pointed out the PUD would have to be modified to allow t factor. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commi~~ioner Michelotti, seconded by C mmbl.Sloner Wright <br />f"mding that the project would have an insignificant adverse en on the environment <br />and a De Minimi~ impact on the site's wildlife, and recommen' approval of the draft <br />Negative Declaration prepared for Case PUD-81-30-27M1PUD-8 -9M. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br /> <br />Commi!OSioners Mahern, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wri t and Chairman <br />Hovingh <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />AYES: <br /> <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-93-23 was entered and adopted recommendin approval of the draft <br />Negative Declaration prepared for Case PUD-81-30-27M1PUD-8S -9M as motioned. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commi~~ioner Michelotti, seconded by C mmi....loner Wright <br />making the required PUD f"mdings and recommending approval f Case PUD-81-30- <br />27M1PUD-8S-8-9M, subject to the conditions of Exhibit B with e following <br />modification: <br /> <br />o That the City shall retain the discretionary authori in regard to review <br />and approve any proposed retail/commercial use fo Lot 14A. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />Commi~~ioners Mahern, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wri t and Chairman <br />Hovingh <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />AYES: <br /> <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-93-24 was entered and adopted recommendin approval of Case <br />PUD-81-30-27MIPUD-8S-8-9M as motioned. <br /> <br />A motion was made by COmmi"Sloner Michelotti, seconded by C mmi....ioner Wright <br />recommending approval of the draft Amendment to the Develop ent Agreements <br />prepared for Case PUD-81-30-27MIPUD-8S-8-9M. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes May 12, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 13 <br />