Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ Chairman Hovingh addressed Condition 10.a. in regard to the pede 'an pathway. Mr. <br />Swift noted that this was an informal pathway; however, it is being elocated to the side of <br />the creek at the Fish and Game Department's request and will be a ormal pathway. <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh further questioned Mr. Swift as to whether a pe son might walk on a <br />formal pathway to the 3D-inch diameter oak tree on the west side 0 the project. Mr. Swift <br />agreed that could be done; the pathway will then advance to the no side of the creek and <br />end at the main street bisecting the project. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED, <br /> <br />Brad Hirst, 6280 W. Las Positas Boulevard, represented the applica 'on. He stated that he <br />has read the conditions of approval and has no problem with them. He noted that he has <br />worked extensively with the neighbors in Carriage Gardens and Ros pointe and appreciated <br />the professional manner in which they conducted themselves. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti questioned Mr. Hirst as to the previous di cussion regarding the <br />time frame of the tentative map. Mr. Hirst stated that everybody sc bles to get the <br />tentative map done in time with the Growth Management approval. He felt that it would <br />make things easier for the Planning Department and the applicant if e two were concurrent. <br />He felt that based on what they know today it would make sense, d would save on cost and <br />paper work. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Mahern's question, Mr. Hirst said tha the present time frame <br />for approval of the tentative map is all right for his project. <br /> <br />In response to discussion of a possible change in the tentative map 'me frame, Mr. Beougher <br />stated that normally a subdivision map has two years time for appro al with a one-year <br />extension. He felt it was perfunctory to come before the Commissi n after two years to see <br />if they are progressing. At that point, if they are not progressing, e Commission may wish <br />to reconsider approval of the tentative map. <br /> <br />TIlE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CWSED, <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commi"Sioner Michelotti, seconded by ommi"Sioner McGuirk <br />making the required ('mdings for the proposed tentative map an approving Tentative <br />Tract Map 6581 subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit B, <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Mahern, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wright and Chairman Hovingh <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />October 28, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />