PC 09/09/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

allowed the use of the Tennis and Community Park to construct a ub facility to be primarily used for the neighborhood, but open to the public for a embership. Mr. Swift said he had no information on that matter at this time. PUBLIC HEARINGS AP- 2-1 Z- 2-49 Nonnan D roth B torffl h' her Appeal oC the decision oC the Design Review Board approving a application oC Green Scaping/Elder Jerez to retain an existing 238 sq. ft. pavilion wit a deck, approximately 11 feet in height, located at 2943 Victoria Meadow Court. Zo . g for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) - Medium Density Residential District. Application continued to September 23, 1992. .~ PUD-81-30-26M!PUD-85-8-8M. Prudential Insurance ComDanv Application for 1) a major modification to the PUD (Planned U 't Development) for Hacienda Business Park to make the following changes to Ordin nce 1325: a) modify site development standards contained within the Park's Design uidelines to reduce the maximum pennitted floor area ratios on selected lots; b) change he land use designation for the entire area of Site 14A on Hopyard Road, between Cora ado Lane and Inglewood Drive Cram OGPD (Garden Office Planning District) 0 CPD (Retail/Commercial and Financial Planning District), and c) mod Cy Condition 13 to change the requirements pertaining to traffic impacts and mitiga ion; and 2) development agreement amendment to provide for the aforemen oned changes. Zoning Cor the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development) - Industrial Commercial, and Offices District. Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of Case PUD-81-30-26M/PUD- 85-8-8M subject to the conditions of the staff report. Commissioner McGuirk expressed concern that perhaps in ten years own the road if this is approved that should a developer want to build on one of these lots i Hacienda Business Park that the Commission could not deny that application for what y might feel is adverse traffic conditions at specific intersections surrounding Hacienda Busi ess Park. Mr. Swift agreed that this was correct. Commissioner Pinch stated that he has met with the applicant. He c ncurred with the Conditions of Approval, but said he would have some questions later ~ Commissioner Wright asked Mr. Swift for clarification in regard to affic mitigations. Mr. Swift stated that staff feels that at full build-out of these lots plus all e other properties, either existing or approved within the City, they will have satisfacto levels of service at all intersections based on the models run. However, staff is still workin with traffic engineering as they are getting into the General Plan revision to see hat other circulation Planning Commission Minutes September 9, 1992 Page 3