My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/26/1992
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC 08/26/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:26:42 PM
Creation date
5/25/2005 3:12:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/26/1992
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 08/26/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />structures as attractive as possible, while at the same time keep th people as close to the <br />stores as possible. This would be for safety and comfort reasons. <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh observed that in the event of parking structu in the future he would <br />like for the original landscape to be maintained as much as possib e. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk said he is not really pleased with a parki g structure planned for the <br />location as it is very visible from Foothill Road. He suggested th t it might be moved <br />farther back in the direction of the freeway. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING W AS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright questioned Mr. Swift about the height elev tions of the parking <br />structures. Mr. Swift noted that the height of the parking structu s cannot be higher than <br />the height of the mall stores. He reminded the Commission that e final design of the <br />parking structures will be subject to review by the City and the C mmission. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk questioned Mr. Swift as to how the par . g structures would <br />ultimately affect traffic. Mr. Swift noted that the developer woul be responsible for traffic <br />mitigation due to parking structures. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commk~ioner Michelotti, seconded b Commi....ioner Wright <br />recommending approval of the draft Negative Declaration pre ared Cor the Stoneridge <br />Regional Shopping Center Development Agreement inasmuch project approval would <br />not have any significant adverse eCCects on the environment. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Mahern, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wri ht, and Chairman Hovingh <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-92-76 was entered and adopted recommendin approval of the draft <br />Negative Declaration prepared for the Stoneridge Regional Shopp ng Center Development <br />Agreement as motioned. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Michelotti, seconded b Commi..sioner Wright <br />recommending approval oC the draft Stoneridge Regional Sho ping Center Development <br />Agreement with the following modification: <br />o That the draft Development Agreement track th Wells Fargo Agreement <br />with respect to any future reimbursements. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Mahern, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wri ht, and Chairman Hovingh <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes August 26, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.