My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/12/1992
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC 08/12/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:26:29 PM
Creation date
5/25/2005 3:09:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/12/1992
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 08/12/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />o That the studio will be allowed to remain open on Sunday from 1:00 pm to <br />7:00 pm. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Mahern, Michelotti, and Wright <br />Commissioner McGuirk and Chairman Hovingh <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-92-68 was entered and adopted approving Case -92-33 as motioned. <br /> <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh stated that he voted no because he felt that staf s recommended hours of <br />operation was suitable. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk stated he voted no for the same reason as <br /> <br />The applicant or other interested parties have 15 days in which to a peal the decision to City <br />Council. In addition, a City Council member could be requested to appeal the decision. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Z-92-156/AP-92-12. Oil Chanl!"ers <br />Appeal of the Design Review Board denial of an application Cor esign review approval <br />to modify the comprehensive sign program Cor Rose Pavilion m to allow three wall- <br />mounted signs that do not comply with the approved colors. Zo . g Cor the property is <br />PUD (Planned Unit Development) - Commercial District. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending denial of Case Z 92-156/AP-92-12. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mahern questioned staff as to whether they objected t the use of black and <br />white on the signs. Mr. Swift stated that these colors are not inc1ud in the five permitted <br />colors for the comprehensive sign program for Rose Pavilion Ill. addition, his <br />understanding is that the requested sign will be the new corporate 10 0 nationwide for Oil <br />Changers. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Seth Bland, 4511 Willow Road, represented the application. He stat that Speiker Partners <br />encouraged them to request the sign colors as noted. He added that e depicted sign is <br />supposed to be a national logo. He noted that various other business s have logos; in <br />addition, he had noted some signs that had black and white in them. He felt the sign was <br />very attractive. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Commissioner Mahern stated she favored approval of the application ecause she is a strong <br />proponent of good signage and logos. She felt the sign was appropri te. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes August 12, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.