My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/12/1992
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC 08/12/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:26:29 PM
Creation date
5/25/2005 3:09:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/12/1992
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 08/12/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o Condition 28 Leave condition to be worked out be een developer and City. <br />o Condition 30 Staff prefers that the timeframe be inc uded in the overall plan; <br />this needs to go back to the Design R view Board and the <br />Planning Commission for final action. <br />o Condition 31 Leave as in staff recommendation. <br />o Condition 37 Acceptable as revised. <br />o Condition 43 Acceptable as revised. <br />o Condition 47 Leave as in staff recommendation. ho ever, last sentence can be <br />removed. <br />o Condition 52 Leave as in staff recommendation. <br />o Condition 54 Acceptable as revised. <br />o Condition 58 Acceptable as revised. <br />o Condition 63 Acceptable as revised. <br />o Condition 72 Acceptable as revised. <br />o Condition 76 Leave as in staff recommendation. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued as to where the access road should be. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> <br />Mr. Fairfield stated that he would give the City an easement in bo directions of Red <br />Feather Drive. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commhl~ioner Mahern, seconded by Co . ioner McGuirk, <br />making the PUD f"mdings for the proposed development as liste in the staff report; and <br />adopting a resolution recommending approval oC Case PUD-91-1 to the City Council, <br />subject to the conditions and mitigation measures listed in Exhib t B, with the Collowing <br />modifications: <br /> <br />o Modify those conditions as requested by the appli nt and approved by <br />staCC, with particular attention to Condition 8 that he applicant work with <br />staff to provide an easement for a second access ro d; <br /> <br />o That the location and size oC the park be worked 0 t with the Parks and <br />Recreation Director and Commi""ion; and come ba k before the Planning <br />Commission at the Tentative Map Stage; and <br /> <br />o That the Collowing Conditions oC Approval remain staCC recommended <br />or to be worked out with staff: <br /> <br /> <br />o Conditions 6a, 17, 19, 20, 22, 28, 30, 31, 47, 52, a <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes August 12, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.