Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,- <br /> <br />The Commi,,~ion rmds that aU feasible mitigations have been incorporated <br />into the project to reduce mitigatable impacts to level oC insignificance, <br />and C'mds that there are specific project-related befits which override the <br />unmitigatable significant environmental effects, a as described in the <br />attached Exhibit C ("Findings and Statement oC erriding <br />Considerations"). <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Mahern, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wrig t, and Chairman Hovingh <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-92-66 was entered and adopted recommending proval of the EIR and <br />Exhibit C for Case PUD-91-13 as motioned. <br /> <br />At this time Mr. Swift and the Commission went over each item of Exhibit B as revised by <br />the applicant. They were as follows: <br /> <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br /> <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br /> <br />Condition 2 <br />Condition 3 <br />Condition 4 <br />Condition 6a <br />Condition 7a <br />Condition 7e <br />Condition 8 <br /> <br />Condition 9 <br />Condition 9c <br />Condition 11 <br />Condition 17 <br />Condition 18 <br />Condition 19 <br />Condition 20 <br />Condition 21 <br />Condition 22 <br />Condition 27 <br /> <br />Acceptable as revised. <br />Acceptable as revised. <br />Deletion as requested. <br />Leave as in staff recommendation. <br />Acceptable as revised. <br />Acceptable as revised. <br />Modify language to say second access oad can be left up to <br />staff and applicant that can be either R Feather Drive <br />extension or another northerly extensio that was recommended <br />by staff; the road is not required to be uilt at this time, but an <br />easement shall be provided so that the ity can build this road <br />with its own funds if found to be desi Ie. The applicant will <br />be required to put up money for the r d within their own <br />property. (He noted that the Commissi n needs to clarify where <br />they desire the access road in the futur <br />Alternative E rather than D. <br />Delete as requested. <br />Word change acceptable. <br />Leave as in staff recommendation. <br />Acceptable as revised. <br />Leave as in staff recommendation. <br />Work out with staff. <br />Acceptable as revised. <br />Leave condition to be worked out betw n developer and City. <br />Needs clarification; developer wants pri ate park; Commission <br />wants public park; staff needs direction s to where the park <br />should be; staff advocates a park no sm ler than five acres. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes August 12, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 13 <br />