PC 07/08/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

~ Commissioner Mahern would delete Condition 7, and in a separate a tion direct staff and Council to consider a Sidewalk Improvement District. However, sh would not wish to force the property owner or lessee to have to pay for the sidewalk. Chairman Hovingh stated he had concerns that all property owners not being treated fairly. He would not wish to force an existing property owner or te ant to install a sidewalk. He further discussed the formation of a Sidewalk Improvement Dis . t with Mr. Higdon, and said he would not wish for other property owners to be cajoled i to participating in a Sidewalk Improvement District. A motion was made by Comml..~ioner Mahern, seconded by Co . ioner Wright, making the required conditional use rmdings and approving Case UP-92-28 subject to the conditions of Exhibit B, with the following modifications: o Delete Condition 7. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Mahern, McGuirk, Wright, and Chair an Hovingh None Commissioner Michelotti None Resolution No. PC-92-60 was entered and adopted approving Case U -92-28 as motioned. Commissioner Mahern then requested that the City Council explore d study the possibility of having a Sidewalk Improvement District. She further stated she is not happy with forcing a property owner to dedicate an easement and pay for the installation of a sidewalk. up a landscaped berm to begin with. Chairman Hovingh stated he is not convinced of the wisdom of teari to install a sidewalk, and felt that a sidewalk should have been install Mr. Swift noted that the City is trying to put in sidewalks without t landscaping. 'ng out berms and A motion was made by Chairman Hovingh, seconded by Co . ioner Mahern, recommending that City Council explore and study a Sidewalk provement District for construction of sidewalks around the outer periphery of Stonerid e Mall Road. Planning Commission Minutes July 8, 1992 Page 13