My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 07/08/1992
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC 07/08/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2017 4:26:11 PM
Creation date
5/25/2005 3:02:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/8/1992
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 07/08/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ "flippantly" estimated the gallons to be around 1,200. He noted th t a horse can drink <br />anywhere from five gallons in the winter to 35-40 in the summer, pending on the heat and <br />how hard they get ridden. He was hesitant to estimate another ball k figure on how much <br />water is pumped because he has not fully tested the water system. e did acknowledge the <br />water level of the spring was greater in the autumn; he said he has ot seen a drastic drop in <br />the water level. He explained that he just put the spigot in about ree weeks ago and felt <br />there was plenty of water in the area. <br /> <br />David Glenn, 5650 Foothill Road, stated he is speaking on behalf 0 the Preserve the <br />Ridgelands. He presented to the Commission and Recording Secre copies of a <br />memorandum dated April 16, 1992, addressed to the Council and anning Commission from <br />the City Manager, in regard to approval of the lot line adjustment etween the JoeUGreist <br />property and the A-M Homes property. He felt this would give so e background <br />information to his comments. He noted that even the entire docum nt did not mention that a <br />significant portion of Tehan Creek and a natural spring are includ in that lot line <br />adjustment. Mr. Glenn stated he had contacted the Planning Dep ent and consequently, <br />Mr. Swift visited the site with him and then wrote a staff report to e City Manager, which <br />indicated the lot line adjustment is in conformance. <br /> <br />Mr. Glenn continued to express his concerns about the matter, and elt the biggest source of <br />water is being demolished by Mr. Joel's actions. He stated all the iping and installation of <br />the water system had been installed without permission from the Ci y. He expressed further <br />concerns about there being no guarantees as to who would control e water in the spring. <br /> <br />Mr. Glenn summarized his concerns: (I) Ms. Sorenson had not b n notified of the water <br />diversion; (2) Applicant did not follow the required guidelines as p t forth by staff <br />conditions; (3) If the flow of the water is diverted, how would that fect health and safety <br />factors, particularly that of Ms. Sorenson? He thought many mis s had been made and <br />that hydrological studies should be done in order to not compound e problem. <br /> <br />Chairman Hovingh asked Mr. Swift if there had been any discussio in PUD-89-13 about the <br />spring. Mr. Swift said there had not been discussion about the spri g. He responded to Mr. <br />Glenn's comment that there had been no notice given to the neighb rs regarding the lot line <br />adjustment hearing. He stated there is no requirement that any no . whatsoever be given <br />on a lot line adjustment; however, that hearing was held before the City Council.. He said <br />the City has gone far beyond the required regulations as to what is ecessary in a lot line <br />adjustment. <br /> <br />Lynn A. Sorenson, 4432 Foothill Road, said she understood what . Swift said about it not <br />being necessary to give notice of a lot line adjustment. However, he felt that she should <br />have been given notice as she had easement rights on property that as transferred. She felt <br />she had an interest and should have been notified. She called atten . on to the letter given to <br />the Planning Department which stated her opposition to the applica on for proposed water <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />July 8, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.