PC 07/08/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Mahem would delete Condition 7, and in a separate ction direct staff and Council to consider a Sidewalk Improvement District. However, s e would not wish to force the property owner or lessee to have to pay for the sidewalk. Chairman Hovingh stated he had concerns that all property owners e not being treated fairly. He would not wish to force an existing property owner or nant to install a sidewalk. He further discussed the formation of a Sidewalk Improvement Dis 'ct with Mr. Higdon, and said he would not wish for other property owners to be cajoled into participating in a Sidewalk Improvement District. A motion was made by Commissioner Mahern, seconded by C . ioner Wright, making the required conditional use findings and approving C e UP-92-28 subject to the conditions of Exhibit B, with the following modifications: o Delete Condition 7. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Mahern, McGuirk, Wright, and Chai man Hovingh None Commissioner Michelotti None Resolution No. PC-92-60 was entered and adopted approving Case P-92-28 as motioned. Commissioner Mahern then requested that the City Council explore and study the possibility of having a Sidewalk Improvement District. She further stated she . s not happy with forcing a property owner to dedicate an easement and pay for the installati n of a sidewalk. Chairman Hovingh stated he is not convinced of the wisdom of to install a sidewalk, and felt that a sidewalk should have been ins Mr. Swift noted that the City is trying to put in sidewalks without t 'ng out berms and landscaping. A motion was made by Chairman Hovingh, seconded by Co . ioner Mahern, recommending that City Council explore and study a Sidewalk provement District for construction of sidewalks around the outer periphery of Stoneri ge Mall Road. Planning Commission Minutes July 8, 1992 Page 13