My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/10/1992
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC 06/10/1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2013 3:44:16 PM
Creation date
5/25/2005 2:54:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/10/1992
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 06/10/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />split in half, the <br />best to have all <br />Ie-story, the height of <br />st. He would prefer to <br /> <br />that if two lots were deleted from lots 44-49 and lots 45 and 48 wer <br />developer could keep the four large lots. He did not think it would <br />single-story homes facing the Hirst/Tong project; if they were all si <br />those houses should at least be changed somewhat to give some inte <br />go with possibly six single-story houses instead of eight. <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commil<<<ioner Wright, seconded by Co . ioner McGuirk <br />f'mding that Case PUD-92-4 is in conformance with the Stonerid e Drive Specific Plan <br />and the Pleasanton General Plan. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners McGuirk, Michelotti, Wright, and Ch 'rman Hovingh <br />Commissioner Mahem <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />PUD-92-4 is in <br />ton General Plan as <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-92-47 was entered and adopted finding that C <br />conformance with the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan and the Plea <br />motioned. <br /> <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commi<<<<ioner Wright, seconded by Co . ioner McGuirk <br />making the PUD f'mdings for Case PUD-92-4 as listed in the sta report. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Mahem, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wrig t, and Chairman Hovingh <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br /> <br />findings for Case PUD- <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-92-48 was entered and adopted making the P <br />92-4 as motioned. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Comm;<<sioner Michelotti, seconded by <br />recommending approval of Case PUD-92-4 subject to the condi <br />with the following modifications: <br /> <br />ommi<<<<ioner McGuirk <br />ons listed in Exhibit "B" <br /> <br />o Condition 2 - Amend as stated by staff report; <br /> <br />o Condition 4.a. - That staff try to work out a 2-lot configuration facing <br />Martin Avenue; <br /> <br />__ P1annina: Commil8ion Minutell <br />June 10, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.