PC 05/20/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

~ Commissioner Mahem discussed the flexible zones with Mr. lserso . She expressed concern that if they commit to flexible zones, they would be limiting the wi th of the streets. She also expressed concern that a four-way stop sign on Rose/Neal Str ts might create some problems as it is a fairly busy intersection. In response to a question from Commissioner Mahem, Mr. Iserson eplied that the existing trees will stay; however, additional trees will be planted in between the existing trees to provide more shade and color. Commissioner Mahem further questioned if the present owners of d wntown restaurants have all been contacted regarding the flexible zones and outdoor dining. Mr. Iserson advised that the staff has contacted all property owners and merchants concernin the public meetings which have been held, but they have not been asked specifically ab ut the flexible zone. Commissioner Mahern commented that she has recently gone to the City of Mountain View to see how their downtown was renovated. She questioned whether the planters, if installed in Pleasanton, would be a responsibility of the City. Mr. Iserson vised that he felt it would probably be up to the merchants to maintain the planters. C mmissioner Mahem further suggested that an association somewhat like a homeowners' ssociation could be utilized to maintain the planters. Commissioner Wright felt that flexible zones could be handled on a variable basis, as stated by staff but would wish to be assured of that, as well as that parkin will be taken into consideration. Mr. Iserson advised that the flexible zones could be andled on a varied basis, and that parking should not be a problem, especially if the p king lot plan comes into being. Chairman Hovingh questioned Mr. lserson as to the sizes of the fle ible zones. Mr. Iserson replied that each store owner would have his own space directly in ront of his business. The Task Force has not considered whether a business next to a spa e not being utilized as a flexible zone could use that space, although he did not see why that couldn't occur. He said some kind of mutual arrangement would have to take place between owners in that regard. Mr. Iserson then introduced Michael Freedman, design consultant fi r the project. Mr. Freedman gave an extensive slide presentation on the Main sti- t design and explained the various options with their accompanying costs. He noted that d wntown areas are now more concerned with the increase of pedestrian traffic and with slo ing down commuter traffic. Street circulation is being designed so that cars can go arou d the block for ease in parking. He further noted that in downtown designs, trees are plan as close to the center of the street as possible, as opposed to being close to a building for commuter traffic. He further noted that Option B, which was preferred by the Design Re 'ew Board, amounted to a cost of $1.5 million. Mr. Freedman noted that staff has requested that he investigate the ssibility of using colored asphalt. He noted that colored asphalt is very cost effective while at the same time ~ Special Meeting - Minutes Planning Commission May 20, 1992 Page 3