Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />Dr. Sjoberg noted that the roof color is a teal green that should b nd with the trees; the <br />utility lines will be hidden. He then went into detail of how the nomic feasibility of the <br />project would be harmed by taking some square footage off the s cture. He felt that if he <br />has to cut farther back the project would not work; if the building is reduced, it would have <br />to come out of the center, and he felt this was simply not feasible Hence, he would like to <br />delete Condition 2. In regard to Condition 15, he felt a sidewalk ould further traumatize <br />the trees. He further noted that his architect, Michael Goldswo , said that if the building <br />is reduced, it would actually still look the same size. However, .th reduction they would <br />lose 6-8 underground parking spaces. Dr. Sjoberg further noted at his practice is very <br />successful and he needs the extra office space for patient rooms d administrative offices. <br />He discussed Condition 22 in regard to parking and noted that no ally only nine cars would <br />be parked in the lot at one time. It could get up as high as 18, b this is the exception, not <br />the rule. Staff hours are staggered so all spaces would not be u . . at once. In addition, <br />parking on the street could be done, if necessary. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Michelotti's question, Dr. Sjoberg mmented that the structure <br />would be sitting two feet within the dripline as measured from the second floor overhang. <br /> <br /> <br />Michael Goldsworthy, 633 Abbie Street, noted that as the architec , he was also concerned <br />about the trees. He pointed out that he had told the arborist of th . priority of keeping the <br />trees safe. With that in mind, the arborist did his survey and conc uded that a distance of <br />seven ft. would keep the trees protected. The applicant then elec to stay 10 ft. from the <br />dripline for further safety. At this point, they felt comfortable wi proceeding with their <br />plans. In regard to the teal color of the roof, Mr. Goldsworthy be ieved that was superior to <br />the weathered copper. In response to Chairman Mahern's questio , he replied that the <br />roofing material is of ribbed panels, not completely flat. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh commented that he felt this was the nicest roject that Mr. <br />Goldsworthy has designed. <br /> <br />Al Dutchover, 450 Main Street, noted he is the landscape architect for the project and that <br />the landscape plan as shown is conceptual in nature. He addressed Condition 4.a. in regard <br />to the shrubs: He felt shrubs that grow to about three ft. maximu would be superior to <br />those shown in the condition, which grow at least to five ft. or mo . He noted the deck is <br />only four ft. in height and felt it would be more attractive to keep e shrubs about three ft. <br />tall. In response to Chairman Mahern, he replied that he is certain y willing to work with <br />staff on this matter, and just does not want the case conditioned to sing the plants listed in <br />Condition 4.a. <br /> <br />William Owens, 2423 Crestline Road, Pleasanton, stated he was <br />commented that he is pleased that Pleasanton is so concerned with <br />and pleased it is Sycamore trees adjacent to the building. He said <br />tolerate the most injury of any tree and can literally .wall off" di <br /> <br /> <br />rist for the project. He <br />e protection of trees, <br />ycamore trees can <br />s. He noted that <br /> <br />Minutes Planning Commission <br />March 25, 1992 <br /> <br />PageS <br />