Laserfiche WebLink
<br />THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD WAS CLOS"Fn. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti noted this would be a "straw" vote. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Michelotti, seconded by Co <br />the Planning Commission will consider adoption of a resolution <br />General Plan Amendment, as we believe that this General Plan A <br />interest of the City of Pleasanton and its citizens. <br /> <br /> <br />missioner Hovingh, that <br />sing the Ridgeland's <br />endment is not in the best <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Hovingh, McGuirk, Michelotti, and hairman Mahern <br />None <br />Commissioners Horan and Wright <br />None <br /> <br />It was noted that further discussion of the reasons for opposition w uld be discussed at the <br />end of the meeting. <br /> <br />OJ n BUSINE.~S - PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br />PUD-89-14-lD. Crail!: Sioberv <br />Application for PUD development plan approval for an appro. tely 20,110 sq. ft. <br />office building to be constructed on an approximately 1.13 acre ite located at 4900 <br />Pleasanton Avenue. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned nit Development) _ <br />Office District. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of <br />to the conditions of the staff report. <br /> <br />PUD-89-14-lD, subject <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC lIRA-RING WAS OPRNEn. <br /> <br />Dr. Craig Sjoberg, 4713 First Street, Pleasanton, represented the a plication and called <br />attention to a letter passed out tonight. He went into great detail, s ting that he has enjoyed <br />the process and learning experience he has been through in attemp' g to build a structure. <br />He presented a small model of the structure to the Commission and further described the <br />layout to them. He noted that the tree report shows the building be safely placed seven <br />ft. from the dripline. In actuality, he intends to put it 10 ft. away r extra protection. He <br />disagreed with the staff report's assertion that the tree would be ed if the structure is <br />not moved further than 10 ft. away from the dripline. He further d scribed the layout of the <br />tree and the roots. <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />Minutes Planning Commission <br />March 25, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />