PC 02/12/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner McGuirk discussed the matter of the carports with . Swift. Mr. Swift said staff felt that the addition of a number of carport structures would nhance the appearance of the parking lot and alleviate what they considered a big empty spot was satisfied with a lattice fence to obscure the view. that because of the have a two-story unit nit as on Division Street. In response to a question from Chairman Mahern, Mr. Swift repli variety of house heights on St. Mary Street, that it would be better on the end across from St. Mary Street, rather than a single-story Commissioner Horan raised the issue as to whether the housing wo Id be considered low income senior housing. Mr. Swift said staff is recommending that t remain senior housing, but staff has not required or put forth a restriction regarding what ent would have to be. Commissioner Horan noted that the staff report indicates the units ould be low income senior housing. Mr. Swift responded that this language is not co t because there are no conditions that the units be rented at anything less than fair market price. However, he noted that the Commission could require a condition that would uire several of the units be reserved for low income rent. He further commented that the licant has indicated he will seek to make them affordable to lower income people, either rough growth management exemption or various senior housing programs. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Mike Madden, 2776 Hartley Gate Court, Pleasanton, represented e application. He ~ thanked Mr. Swift and staff for their assistance to him. He addre sed a number of the conditions: Conditions 11 and 12 - he agreed to pay their pro-ra share, but did not wish to pay more than that. He had no problem with the conditions. Chairman Mahern asked the applicant if staff has indicated what e pro-rata share of installing underground utilities as noted in Condition 11 and 12 ght be. Mr. Swift estimated that the cost would be a per foot cost of installing unde round utilities in a new subdivision divided by two, based on a frontage to the street. Mr Madden noted he had no problem with that. Commissioner Hovingh questioned Mr. Swift about the laterallin s. Mr. Swift thought there were three 1aterallines stubbed into the property, one on Santa 'ta and two on Division Street. Mr. Madden said he understood the concern that this project be rved only for seniors. As he understood it, that would become a part of the PUD and w uld also be in the deed restriction. As far as the affordability, it is his desire to keep th units at a moderate or low income rate, but he could not say exactly as he does not kno what he will ultimately be allowed to build. Commissioner Michelotti asked Mr. Madden if he would be wi see what can be worked out as far as providing affordable rent responded that he would certainly be willing to work with the Ci . g to work with the City to seniors. Mr. Madden on this issue. Minutes Planning COmmission February 12, 1992 page 4