Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ too, would stay within the Foothill Road Overlay District Guidelin as much as possible. <br />He would also move the project farther back from Foothill Road. <br /> <br />The balance of Case PUD-89-17 was continued to February 20 at p.m. in the Council <br />Chambers. <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright said he would definitely want 51 units or I , if ever approved. He <br />also agreed with all the other Commission's comments. <br /> <br />(At 10:35 p.m. the meeting was resumed after a five-minute break. <br /> <br />PlJD..91-15. west View Pronerties. lid. (Louis G.Baldaccil <br />Application for rezoning to the PUD (planned Unit Developme ) - MDR (Medium <br />Density Residential) District and development plan approval to ow the construction of <br />46 paired single-famlly homes and two detached single-famlly h mes proposed for an <br />approximately 7.O-acre site located southeast of the Stoneridge 've and Stone Point <br />Way intersection. Zoning is PUD (planned Unit Development) MDR (Medium Density <br />Residential) and HDR (High Density Residential) Districts. <br /> <br />Application continued to 2/20/1992. <br /> <br />UP-91-10. PI....~anton Garbal!e Service. Inc. <br />Application for conditional use permit approval for a recycling facility and the following <br />uses at 3110 Busch Road: sewage pumping service, truck and uipment repair, tire <br />sales and service, street sweeping service, and a leasing service or storage containers <br />and portable toilets. Also to be reviewed is compliance with th original use permit for <br />the waste transfer station. Zoning for the property is I-G (Ge eral Industrial) District. <br /> <br />Application continued to 2/26/92. <br /> <br />Ridl!elands Cnmmittee's ProDosed General Plan Amendment <br />Review and Comment of the Ridgelands Committee's proposed General Plan <br />Amendment for the 7,100 acre area located generally west of othill Road, South of 1- <br />580, east of Palomares Road, and north of the Ridgelands Re onal Park. The General <br />Plan Amendment would create a 3,400 acre buffer zone along -580 and the east face of <br />the Pleasanton ridge, and a 3,700 acre development zone whi would allow a <br />residential neighborhood with a maximum of 2,640 units. <br /> <br />Letters from Susan Wacek and Sue Evans stating their opposition any development on the <br />ridge were presented to the Commission and staff before the mee ng. <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report which recommended the Com 'ssion open the public <br />hearing for testimony; then make their own comments and/or reco mendations it wishes to <br />relay to the Council. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Minutes Planning commission <br />February 12, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 14 <br />