Laserfiche WebLink
<br />project would still be feasible at less units. He wished to state for the record that he felt <br />staff did a thorough staff report and that they made some very vall recommendations about <br />the need for a geological survey. He continued to say that as a ho e owner he wanted to <br />make sure the lots were spaced properly to maintain the rural atmo here. <br /> <br />Murt Van Dreser, 40 Castledown Road, Pleasanton, said he had y documented his <br />comments in December 1990, but wished to reaffirm that the Foo Road Overlay District <br />was a good plan which he hoped they would follow. He continued to say that he felt <br />portions of the project simply had too high a density. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith had no further comments. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti questioned Mr. Swift about how the open space would be handled <br />and maintained. Mr. Swift stated that all of the property in this pI' ~ect is owned by <br />individual home owners and that the large area of open space is sh wn as part of the Currin <br />lot. Therefore, all the open space would be maintained by the indi . duals. He further <br />responded that there must be some type of fire control, and in esse ce, would be no different <br />than how the Deer Oaks subdivision open space is handled. Furth discussion ensued in <br />regard to potential landslide dangers and resulting liability. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Hovingh, seconded by Com issioner Michelotti <br />recommending the adoption of a resolution certifying that the S is adequate and complete <br />in assessment of the project's impacts. <br /> <br /> <br />number of Heritage <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti further discussed the matter of limiting <br />trees that could be removed. <br /> <br />Chairman Mahern noted that she had just received the CEQA docu ent tonight, and felt they <br />could only act on the SEIR document. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan discussed the plan with Mr. Swift. He noted that if the road were to <br />be moved further west, that the third row of houses would have to moved. He expressed <br />concern that this might put these houses in the slide area. <br /> <br />In response to Commissioner Wright's question, Mr. Swift stated at the applicant agrees <br />with all the conditions except for the condition which would bring e lots down to 51. <br /> <br />The Commission agreed to simply address the SEIR tonight, give e applicant some input, <br />and continue the rest to February 20, 1992. <br /> <br />Minutes Planning Commission <br />February 12, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 12 <br />