Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the next row of homes all facing back yard activities. Mr. Domm <br />been considered and that he did not see this as a problem. <br /> <br />affirmed that this had <br /> <br />Margaret Tracy spoke for the Preserve the Area Ridgelands Com . nee. She was pleased to <br />see the good staff analysis in the EIR. She expressed some con that the project exceeds <br />the average density for the site and is not in complete accordance ith the Foothill Overlay <br />District. She said there is a health risk to at least 25 Heritage in regard to grading and <br />the removal of three. At least three of the lots cannot get water . thout booster pumps and <br />additional water storage tanks. She questioned the availability of sewer service, rue <br />response time and protection; the possibility of earthquakes and m d slides on the site and if <br />the City might be liable for this. <br /> <br /> <br />too small. Mr. <br />ey designated as the <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan expressed some concern that the yards might <br />Dommer felt that the 60-70 ft. setback between the street and what <br />envelope was sufficient. Further discussion ensued on this matter. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan discussed with Mr. Dommer the possibility 0 <br />12 houses across the front. Mr. Dommer said that a year ago it w <br />residents of Country Lane were not in favor of that, so they remov <br /> <br />clustering approximately <br />clustered, but the <br />the cluster concept. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh expressed concern that eventually people ight try to expand their <br />backyards into the ancillary area. Mr. Dommer said this would be addressed in the CC&R's <br />and also in the disclosure of the deed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Michelotti discussed noise mitigation with Mr. Do <br />that open fencing is required for the project; however, solid fencin <br />homes for sound and privacy mitigation. When asked if he favor <br />recommendation, he said that he did not as it would have a visual <br />elevations. <br /> <br />er. Mr. Dommer noted <br />would go between the <br />this staff <br />mpact at the higher <br /> <br />Bob Dine, 7751 Country Lane, stated he would also like to see a <br />project, and said he did not have access to the CEQA AND S <br />taken possession of his own property about two weeks ago. Chai Mahern responded <br />that Mr. Dine could pick up these documents for review from th Planning Department. She <br />further explained the process and timeframe for the project, sta' that the Commission's <br />charge tonight was to see if the CEQA and SElRS address the en' nmental issues. She <br />further noted that Mr. Dine still had time to express his concerns Mr. Dine continued to <br />say that he thought that even a drop to 51 units might be too larg and wondered if the <br /> <br /> <br />sed development. He <br />. vision and felt it would <br />Road. He stated that the <br /> <br />Bob Fillman, 9911 Foothill Road, Pleasanton, lived near the pro <br />expressed concern that the project would look too much like a su <br />detract greatly from the rural character and atmosphere of Foothi <br />project was inappropriate for the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Michael O'Rourke, 7753 Country Lane, stated he would like to <br /> <br />the final map plan. <br /> <br />Minutes Planning Commission <br />February 12. 1992 <br /> <br />Page 11 <br />