Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Robert Cordtz returned to the podium. He maintained that parkin issues were never <br />addressed, but that the church across the street was going to allow the mortuary to use their <br />parking lot, if they found it necessary. Mr. Cordtz thought that s ould be put in the deed. <br />He expressed concern that when Seniors attend funerals, they wo d have a difficult time <br />getting to the mortuary. He also felt Design Review should have ddressed this issue. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Peter MacDonald said he thought he could clear up the confusion. He surmised that Mr. <br />Cordtz had been at a variance hearing, such as now, and traffic is ues were not to be <br />addressed at that point. He said at the Design Review hearing, no one raised the issue of <br />traffic. He figured that the reason they were told they could not d scuss traffic issues is <br />because it was a variance proceeding, not a Design Review meetin . Mr. MacDonald then <br />addressed the second issue of not receiving notices. He observed that probably what <br />happened is that there were two computer runs; Ms. Bianchi's na e and those others who <br />did not receive notices were simply not on the correct list. He als observed that usually <br />neighbors are more sensitive to these issues and would have discu sed it with one another. <br />At this point, these problems are a great inconvenience to the app cant and they can do <br />nothing about it. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Michelotti, seconded by Co missioner Horan <br />recommending denial of the appeal for AP-91-1O and upholding a roval for Case V-91-18. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Horan, Hovingh, McGuirk, Michel tti and Chairman Mahern <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-92-5 was entered and adopted denying Case A -91-10 as motioned. <br /> <br />PUD-91-14. Chris Beratlis <br />Application for Planned Unit Development rezoning and devel pment plan approval for <br />a 15-10t, single-family residential development on an approx' tely 8.9 acre site located <br />at 10 Berat1is Place (north of Crellin Road). Zoning for the p operty is "A" <br />(Agriculture) District. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending approval of C e PUD-91-14 subject to <br />the conditions of the staff report. He called attention to several re ised conditions of <br />approval as passed out tonight. <br /> <br />Minutes Planning Commission <br />January 8, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 14 <br />