Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Swift presented the staff report recommending denial of the a <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright asked whether the entire building had a v <br />property line. Mr. Swift replied that was correct. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Peter MacDonald, 400 Main Street, represented Jess C. Spencer ortuaries. <br />Mr. Spencer, along with Michael GOldsworthy, architect, were pr sent. Mr. MacDonald <br />noted that the mortuary has operated on St. John's Street for abou 20 years with no <br />problems. He further noted that the applicant had met with the ne ghbors last year in order <br />to work out any of their concerns. He commented that an auto lu e business had been <br />denied by Council for that location, but that the mortuary has reee ved approval from <br />Council. The applicant has closed escrow on the property and mu t be out of their present <br />property at a certain time. It appears that parking and traffic are e concerns of the <br />neighbors. Mr. MacDonald noted that Mr. Spencer had tried ag' to meet with the <br />neighbors last night, but apparently none were concerned enough t show up. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan asked Mr. MacDonald to describe what is di ectly behind the building. <br />Mr. MacDonald replied that railroad tracks are behind the buildin <br /> <br /> <br />Michael Goldsworthy, 683 Abbie Street, noted that this particular ning requires a 10 ft. <br />rear setback for the entire length of the property. At the request f the neighbors the <br />applicant is fencing the entire 300 and some feet of property from north to south. The <br />distance from the back fence to the railroad tracks is about 125 ft. it would be about 400 ft. <br />to the closest neighbor. <br /> <br />Commissioner Horan asked who gets the public notices. Mr. Gol sworthy replied that <br />notices were sent to homes 300 ft. plus from the project, along wi notices sent to those <br />neighbors who attended the neighborhood meetings before the proj t went to Design <br />Review. The meeting was noticed for Design Review, for the vance hearing, and also for <br />tonight. <br /> <br /> <br />Juanita Bianchi, 4105 Walnut Drive, said she was not here to add ss the variance, but to <br />state her concerns. <br /> <br />Chairman Mahern pointed out to Ms. Bianchi that the Commissio can only take action <br />tonight on issues related to the variance. <br /> <br />Ms. Bianchi continued to say that she was not notified of the Desi n Review meeting of <br />October 8 and therefore, was not able to attend to voice her conce s. Chairman Mahern <br />reminded her that the application has already been approved and e appeal period is over. <br />Ms. Bianchi insisted she was not notified of the meeting. <br /> <br />Minutes Planning Commission <br />January 8, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 12 <br />