My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-92-78
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC-92-78
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:58 AM
Creation date
5/4/2005 3:39:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/9/1992
DOCUMENT NO
PC-92-78
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-81-30-26M/PUD-85-8-8M
NOTES
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO
NOTES 3
MOD TO GOVERNING HBP PUD
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALXFORNXA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-92-78 <br /> <br />RESOLUTXON RECOMMENDXNG APPROVAL OF THE NEGATXVE DECLARATXON <br />FOR THE APPLICATION OF PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY FOR A <br />MODIFICATION TO THE GOVERNING HACIENDA BUSINESS PARK PLANNED <br />UNXT DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Prudential Insurance company has applied for 1) a major <br />modification to the governing Hacienda Business Park <br />Planned Unit Development (PUD) to: (a) modify the site <br />development standards contained within Table B-1 of the <br />Park's Design Guidelines to reduce the maximum permitted <br />Floor Area Ratio (FAR) on 24 lots; (b) change the land <br />use designation for a 19-acre portion of site 14a from <br />OGPD to CPD; and (c) modify Condition #13 of Ordinance <br />No. 1325 to change the traffic requirements for future <br />development proposals; and 2) a modification to the <br />Development Agreements governing 262 acres of Hacienda <br />Business Park which would lengthen the term and fix the <br />remaining development obligations for these properties; <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />at its meeting of September <br />commission received a proposed <br />the proposed modification; and <br /> <br />9, 1992, the Planning <br />negative declaration for <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning commission has received and reviewed the <br />Initial study dated July 6, 1992, and received the <br />recommendations of the staff; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held at which time the <br />public was given the opportunity to comment on the <br />environmental impacts of the proposal; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the potential <br />impacts in accordance with the applicable state and local <br />guidelines governing the preparation of Negative <br />Declarations and Environmental Impact Reports; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the Planning commission finds <br />proposed project would not have <br />effects on the environment; and <br /> <br />that approval of the <br />any significant adverse <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission further finds that the proposed <br />project would not have any adverse impacts on the site's <br />wildlife. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.