Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-92-78 <br /> <br />RESOLUTXON RECOMMENDXNG APPROVAL OF THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br />FOR THE APPLICATXON OF PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY FOR A <br />MODIFICATION TO THE GOVERNING HACIENDA BUSINESS PARK PLANNED <br />UNIT DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Prudential Insurance company has applied for 1) a major <br />modification to the governing Hacienda Business Park <br />Planned unit Development (PUD) to: (a) modify the site <br />development standards contained within Table B-1 of the <br />Park's Design Guidelines to reduce the maximum permitted <br />Floor Area Ratio (FAR) on 24 lots; (b) change the land <br />use designation for a 19-acre portion of site 14a from <br />OGPD to CPD; and (c) modify Condition #13 of Ordinance <br />No. 1325 to change the traffic requirements for future <br />development proposals; and 2) a modification to the <br />Development Agreements governing 262 acres of Hacienda <br />Business Park which would lengthen the term and fix the <br />remaining development obligations for these properties; <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />at its meeting of September <br />commission received a proposed <br />the proposed modification; and <br /> <br />9, 1992, the Planning <br />negative declaration for <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning commission has received and reviewed the <br />Initial Study dated July 6, 1992, and received the <br />recommendations of the staff; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held at which time the <br />public was given the opportunity to comment on the <br />environmental impacts of the proposal; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning commission has reviewed the potential <br />impacts in accordance with the applicable state and local <br />guidelines governing the preparation of Negative <br />Declarations and Environmental Impact Reports; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the Planning commission finds <br />proposed project would not have <br />effects on the environment; and <br /> <br />that approval of the <br />any significant adverse <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission further finds that the proposed <br />project would not have any adverse impacts on the site's <br />wildlife. <br />