PC-92-44 - Laserfiche WebLink

8-9 Construct erosion control measures (Draft EIR, page 8-13). said mitigation measure was considered and adopted with any pertinent changes in Condition 8-9, Exhibit "B" of the Planning commission staff report dated May 27, 1992. 8-10 Prevent surface erosion (Draft EIR, page 8-14). mitigation measure was considered and adopted with pertinent changes in condition 8-10, Exhibit "B" of planning commission staff report dated May 27, 1992. Said any the Finding: Required The City finds that it is feasible to mitigate this impact to a less-than-significant level by requ1r1ng the applicant and successors in interest to incorporate the specific provisions of Mitigations 8-8 through 8-10 into the project design. The applicant and successors in interest shall incorporate such erosion impact reduction provisions into project design as a "Condition of Approval" to the project. Mitigation Measures 8-8 through 8-10 Feasible and Differential Fill Settlement Impact: potential structural damage from differential fill settlement The city finds that the project may experience damage to structures from differential fill settlement if fill is improperly constructed. This is a potential significant impact (Draft EIR, page 8-14). proposed Mitigation Measures of the EIR The EIR identified the following mitigation measures which would SUbstantially avoid this differential fill settlement impact. 8-11 Fill standards for subdivision grading (Draft EIR, page 8-14) . Said mitigation measure was considered and adopted with any pertinent changes in Condition 8-11, Exhibit "B" of the Planning commission staff report dated May 27, 1992. 8-12 Fill placement procedures (Draft EIR, page 8-15). Said mitigation measure was considered and adopted with any pertinent changes in Condition 8-12, Exhibit "B" of the Planning commission staff report dated May 27, 1992. 18 II .