My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-92-44
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC-92-44
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:54 AM
Creation date
4/20/2005 4:40:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/27/1992
DOCUMENT NO
PC-92-44
DOCUMENT NAME
GP-91-03/PUD-91-03
NOTES
MARSH/SMITH ASSOCIATES/CASTLEWOOD HEIGHTS
NOTES 3
29 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />sanitation: Sewaqe collection <br />Impact: potential problem in downstream sewer collection capacity <br /> <br />The city finds that the existing sewer pump station in the adjacent <br />Carriage Gardens sUbdivision may be inadequate to handle the <br />additional effluent loading by the project. This is a potential <br />significant impact (Draft EIR, page 7-6). <br /> <br />proposed Mitiqation Measure of the EIR <br /> <br />The EIR identified the following mitigation measure which would <br />sUbstantially avoid this impact. <br /> <br />7-7 Ensure adequate sewer collection capacity (Draft EIR, page <br />7-7). Said mitigation measure was considered and adopted with <br />any pertinent changes in Condition 7-6, Exhibit "B" of the <br />Planning Commission staff report dated May 27, 1992. <br /> <br />Findinq: Mitiqation Measure 7-7 Feasible and Required <br /> <br />The city finds that it is feasible to mitigate this impact to a <br />less-than-significant level by requ1r1ng the applicant and <br />successors in interest to install a new pump facility to serve the <br />project and contribute an equitable share to the cost of any long- <br />term pump capacity upgrade. <br /> <br />2.6 Geology, SoilS, Gradinq and Drainaqe <br />Unstable Slopes, Landslides and Slope creep <br /> <br />Impact: structural damaqe by future slope movement <br /> <br />The City finds that project structures could be damaged by future <br />slope movement where structures are constructed on or near existing <br />land slide deposits. This is a potential significant impact (Draft <br />EIR, page 8-11). <br /> <br />proposed Mitigation Measures of the EIR <br /> <br />The EIR identified the following mitigation measures which would <br />substantially avoid this geotechnical impact. <br /> <br />8-1 <br /> <br />Conduct slope stability analyses (Draft EIR, page 8-11). <br />mitigation measure was considered and adopted with <br />pertinent changes in Condition 8-1, Exhibit "B" of <br />planning commission staff report dated May 27, 1992. <br /> <br />Said <br />any <br />the <br /> <br />8-2 Provide detailed slope stabilization program (Draft EIR, page <br />8-11). Said mitigation measure was considered and adopted <br />with any pertinent changes in Condition 8-2, Exhibit "B" of <br />the planning Commission staff report dated May 27, 1992. <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.