My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-92-44
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
PC-92-44
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:54 AM
Creation date
4/20/2005 4:40:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/27/1992
DOCUMENT NO
PC-92-44
DOCUMENT NAME
GP-91-03/PUD-91-03
NOTES
MARSH/SMITH ASSOCIATES/CASTLEWOOD HEIGHTS
NOTES 3
29 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />proposed Mitigation Measure of the EIR <br /> <br />The EIR identified the following mitigation measure which would <br />substantially avoid this visual and site design impact. <br /> <br />5-1 a. Reduce Visual Impact in the Northwest Area of Development <br />(Draft EIR, pages 5-11 and 5-12). Said mitigation <br />measures were considered and adopted with any pertinent <br />changes in Condition 5-1 (A - D), Exhibit "B" of the <br />Planning commission staff report dated May 27, 1992. <br /> <br />Finding: Mitigation Measure 5-1 a. Feasible and Required <br /> <br />The city finds that it is feasible to .m~tigate this impact to a <br />less-than-significant level by requ1r1ng the applicant and <br />successors in interest to incorporate the specific provisions of <br />Mitigation Measure 5-1 a., as listed above, into the project <br />design. The applicant and successors in interest shall incorporate <br />such visual impact reduction provisions into project design, as a <br />"Condition of Approval" to the project. <br /> <br />southwest Area of Development <br /> <br />Impact: visible grading and development impact <br /> <br />The city finds that the project, as currently proposed, would <br />result in highly visible grading and development from the <br />northbound lanes of 1-680. This is a significant impact (Draft <br />EIR, page 5-9). <br /> <br />proposed Mitigation Measure of the EIR <br /> <br />The EIR identified the following mitigation measure which would <br />substantially avoid this grading and site design impact. <br /> <br />5-1 b. Reduce visual Impact in the southwest Area of Development <br />(Draft EIR, page 5-12). Said mitigation measures were <br />considered and adopted with pertinent changes in <br />condition 5-1 (A - C), 5-1 (E), Exhibit "B" of the <br />planning Commission staff report dated May 27, 1992. <br /> <br />Finding: Mitigation Measure 5-1 b. Feasible and Required <br /> <br />The City finds that it is feasible to .m~tigate this impact to a <br />less-than-significant level by requ1r1ng the applicant and <br />successors in interest to incorporate the specific provisions of <br />Mitigation 5-1 b., as listed above, into the project design. In <br />addition with the change of proposed project, the visual impact has <br />been lessened. The applicant and successors in interest shall <br />incorporate such visual impact reduction provisions into project <br />design as a "condition of Approval" to the project. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />11 I; . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.