Laserfiche WebLink
<br />to the park. Therefore, staff feels that the proposed project would be compatible with the <br />natural. topographic features of the site. <br /> <br />Since staff does not find that the project is compatible with previously developed <br />properties in the area, staff does not believe this finding can be made. <br /> <br />4. Whether grading takes into account environmental characteristics and is designed in <br />keeping with the best engineering practices to avoid erosion, slides, or flooding to have as <br />minimal an effect upon the environment as possible. <br /> <br />The site is relatively flat. Grading would be limited to building pads and circulation areas <br />in order to achieve proper drainage into the City's storm water runoff collection system. <br />Grading conducted on the site will be subject to engineering and building standards prior <br />to any development. Although the site is located within the State's Special Studies Zone, <br />the fault has been located approximately 100 feet to the west of the westernmost edge of <br />Foothill Road in the project area. The managers' apartments, the only habitable portion <br />of the proposed project, would be located more than 400 feet from the active fault, which <br />meets the state requirements. According to the United States Department of Housing and <br />Urban Development Flood Hazard maps, no portion of the site is located in a flood <br />hazard zone. <br /> <br />Therefore, staff believes that this finding can be made. <br /> <br />5. Whether streets and buildings have been designed and located to complement the natural <br />terrain and landscape: <br /> <br />As conditioned with increased setbacks and landscaping, the buildings would be located <br />in such a manner that would help integrate the facility with the natural terrain and <br />landscape. The increased setbacks which are recornmended along the public streets as a <br />condition of approval would help create a garden office appearance of the proposed <br />facility and maintain the integrity of the streetscape character. The proposed facility <br />would feature three of the existing Heritage trees as an accent at the comer of Pleasant <br />Hill Road and Stoneridge Drive, while the removal of two other healthy Heritage trees <br />would be mitigated by planting larger 24" and 48" box size trees. <br /> <br />However, given its height and monolithic massing, the proposed facility would block the <br />view of the natural hillside terrain from the east side of Pleasant Hill Road and from the <br />first floor areas of the existing Gold Creek townhomes. Only a portion of the uppermost <br />area of the ridge would be visible from the second story balconies of these residential <br />homes. <br /> <br />Therefore, staff believes that this finding cannot be made. <br />