Laserfiche WebLink
<br />installation of sidewalks along the three streets frontages that surround the site (Policy 6, <br />Circulation Element) and the preservation of Heritage Trees where feasible (Policy 2, <br />Conservation and Open Space Element). However, the project would not meet the <br />General Plan policy of preserving the character of existing residential neighborhoods <br />(Policy I, Land Use Element) due to the perceived incompatibility of the proposed <br />self-storage facility by the residential neighborhood, <br /> <br />Therefore, since the proposed project would meet certain General Plan policies yet would <br />be inconsistent with another, staff does not believe that this finding can be made. <br /> <br />3. Whether the plan is compatible with previously developed properties in the vicinity and <br />the natural, topographic features of the site: <br /> <br />This site is currently a vacant, commercially-zoned parcel. The site is bordered on the <br />north by commercial and office development, on the west by approved residential <br />development, on the east by existing residential properties, and on the south by the City's <br />Moller Park. While the site is separated from these residential and commercial land uses <br />by City streets, the southern end of the property is contiguous to the City's Moller Park. <br />The proposed service commercial development would be consistent with the existing <br />commercial and office uses which are located to the north of the site, yet would at best <br />have a tenuous relationship with the residential neighborhoods! park use which surround <br />the property on the other three sides. The concerns of the residents of these previously <br />developed residential properties have focused on traffic and general land use <br />compatibility and have demonstrated that this type of self-storage land use is not <br />intrinsically compatible with residential uses. Staff believes that there are other <br />commercial and/or office uses for this site which would be more compatible with <br />surrounding uses given the site's location at a transition area between both residential and <br />commercial/office land uses. <br /> <br />Also, the height and monolithic massing of the proposed structure would not be <br />consistent with the existing residential and commercial/office properties in the vicinity. <br />The residential properties are smaller in scale while the commercial properties, although <br />larger in size and scale, have a greater setback from the public streets due to large, <br />expansive landsca~ and parking areas. <br /> <br />Therefore, staff feels that the proposed project would not be compatible with the <br />previously developed properties in the vicinity. <br /> <br />Minimal grading would be necessary in order to achieve positive drainage on the <br />proposed building sites. The active recreational use areas in Moller Park are separated <br />from the proposed development by a natural creek area with a stand of mature trees. <br />Several design elements have been used in the project to roinimi7e any impact on the <br />existing park, including the use of natural, thorny blackberry shrubs along the wall closest <br />