My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-95-40
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
PC-95-40
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:21 AM
Creation date
4/8/2005 2:17:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/28/2005
DOCUMENT NO
PC-95-40
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-95-02
NOTES
JAMES KNUPPE/5A RENT-A-SPACE
NOTES 3
SELF-STORAGE FACILITY
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />pun CONSlDERA TlONS <br /> <br />The Zoning Ordinance of the Municipal Code sets forth purposes of the Planned Unit <br />Development District and "considerations" to be addressed in reviewing a PUD development <br />plan. <br /> <br />1. Whether the plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare: <br /> <br />The proposed self-storage facility has been designed to provide adequate storm drain, <br />sanitary sewer, and water service facilities to serve the proposed use. The applicant will <br />install all required on-site utilities with connections to municipal systems in order to <br />serve the site. The building will be sprinklered to minimize fire hazards and would be <br />required to meet all the standards of the Uniform Building Code and applicable city <br />ordinances. Adequate access would be provided to all structures for police, fire, and <br />other emergency vehicles. Additionally, the driveway entrance to the facility has been <br />located a satisfactory distance from the adjacent public roadway intersection and from the <br />active areas of Moller Park. <br /> <br />While the proposed plan, as conditioned, is aesthetically well-designed, the self-storage <br />facility does not appear to be in the best interest of the adjacent residential neighborhoods <br />as evidenced by the public's comments and concerns. The issues of traffic and land use <br />compatibility raised by those neighbors have been indicative of the perceived <br />incompatibility of the proposed project with the existing properties and land use. Staff, <br />too, concludes that while the project, as conditioned, would at best avoid subjecting the <br />general public and surrounding neighborhoods to specific impacts, the project would not <br />be the best land use for the site, nor would it serve the best interests of the public. While <br />the proposed land use is consistent with the broad commercial General Plan designation <br />of the property, staff believes that other commercial/office uses would be more beneficial <br />to the property and surrounding land uses. <br /> <br />Therefore, staff does not believe that the proposed plan is in the best interests of the <br />public health, safety, and general welfare, and that this finding cannot be made. <br /> <br />2. Whether the plan is consistent with the City's General Plan: <br /> <br />The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element designation of Retail, <br />Highway, and Service CommerciaIJBusiness and Professional Offices which includes <br />commercial uses such as the proposed self-storage facility. The development of a <br />commercial mini-storage facility close to the commercial and office operations in the <br />Stoneridge Mall area and the adjacent residential units would help to provide a service <br />for these businesses and residents as recommended in the General Plan's Land Use <br />Element. Other applicable General Plan policies with which the project would be <br />consistent include separating vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic through the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.