SR 05:092 - Laserfiche WebLink

proved by the City Council regarding the project or its effects, mitigation measures, or alterna- tives. Therefore, no new environmental document accompanies this staff report. VIII. CONCLUSION The three aspects of the proposal discussed in the staff report - Proposed Design Guidelines, Review Procedures, and Planning Commission Notification - would work together to secure a high level of design quality for the homes of the Mariposa Ranch Development in an expedient and efficient manner. A clear, concise, and detailed description of the sites and of the four architectural types would be provided. Complete notification to the Planning Commission of the proposal and of the Zoning Administrator's actions on these home designs would be provided. Staff notes that at its last meeting, the Planning Commission discussed the feasibility of adding a "consent calendar" section to its agenda as a means of streamlining the review/approval process for certain types of project. Staff believes that the above-described process for these homes would come close to creating such a process within the present pro- cedures set forth by Section 18.20, Design Review, of the Pleasanton Municipal Code. IX. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission forward Case PUD-98-16-3M to the City Council with a recommendation of approval by taking the following actions: 1. Make the finding that the proposed modification is covered by the previously approved Final Environmental Impact Report for the Happy Valley Specific Plan; 2. Make the finding that the proposed modification is covered by the previously approved PUD development plan findings for PUD-98-16; and, 3. Adopt a resolution recommending approval of Case PUD-98-16-3M subject to Exhibit "B", Draft Conditions of Approval. Staff Planner: Marion Pavan, (925) 931-5610, mpavan~ci.pleasanton.ca.us Case No. PUD-98-16-3M Page 6 of 6 March 9, 2005